How Do You Calculate Satellite Orbits and Friction Factors in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hyen84
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating satellite orbits and friction factors in physics, specifically focusing on gravitational acceleration at a distance from Earth, the relationship between weight at different heights, and the dynamics of friction when pushing an object at an angle.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore gravitational force equations and the concept of acceleration due to gravity at a specific height above Earth. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between weight at different distances from a planet's surface and the implications of pushing an object with friction involved. Questions arise regarding the definitions of variables and the application of formulas.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the gravitational equations and the necessary relationships between variables. There is ongoing clarification regarding the values of variables and the interpretation of ratios, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the values of certain constants, such as the radius of Earth, and the implications of the given height for calculations. There is also a mention of textbook references that may provide necessary information.

hyen84
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Couples of physics questions...

i have couples of physics question..can someone help..thanks in advance...

1.Synchronous communications satellites are placed in a circular orbit that is 1.57 x 107 m above the surface of the earth. What is the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity at this distance?

2.At a distance H above the surface of a planet, the true weight of a remote probe is 14.7 percent less than its true weight on the surface. The radius of the planet is R. Find the ratio H/R.

3.While moving in, a new homeowner is pushing a box across the floor at a constant velocity. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the box and the floor is 0.419. The pushing force is directed downward at an angle theta below the horizontal. When theta is greater than a certain value, it is not possible to move the box, no matter how large the pushing force is. Find that value of theta.

for number1 i know I'm suppose to used F=ma and a=GM/R^2 ...but i don't know what's R...so i don't know what to do...

#2..i'm just lost..don't know what to do...

#3..dymanic_Friction_Coeficient * [m*g + F_applied*sin(theta)]=F_applied*cos(theta) ...is this the formula for it..if it's..i don't know what number goes to which variables...please help...thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. The gravitational force between two masses is:
[tex]F_G = G\frac{m_1m_2}{d^2}[/tex]
In our case, m1 can be the Earth's mass, m2 can be the satellite's mass, and d is the distance between them which is also the Earth's radius plus the height of the satellite above the surface of it. And as you know F = ma, so to get the acceleration divide the force by the satellite's mass. The radius of Earth should already be given by your textbook, it is assumed you know it unless specified otherwise.

2. The weight of the object on the planet's surface is:
[tex]F_{G1} = G\frac{Mm}{r^2}[/tex]
At a distance H above the surface, it is:
[tex]F_{G2} = G\frac{Mm}{(r + H)^2}[/tex]
You know what the ratio between the weights is:
[tex]\frac{F_{G1}}{F_{G2}} = \frac{{(r + H)}^2}{r^2} = \frac{100\%}{85.3\%}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{r + H}{r} = 1 + \frac{H}{r} = \sqrt{\frac{100\%}{85.3\%}} = 1.083[/tex]
 
Last edited:
hyen84 said:
for number1 i know I'm suppose to used F=ma and a=GM/R^2 ...but i don't know what's R...so i don't know what to do...
R is the distance from the center of the Earth. In this case, R = radius of Earth (look it up!) plus the height above the surface (given as 1.57 x 107 m).
#2..i'm just lost..don't know what to do...
The weight is the force of gravity at each point, given by F = GMm/R^2 (here R = distance from center of planet). You need to compare the weights at both points: at the surface (distance = R) and at the height H (distance = R + H). (Hint: use ratios--G, M, & m will cancel.)
#3..dymanic_Friction_Coeficient * [m*g + F_applied*sin(theta)]=F_applied*cos(theta) ...is this the formula for it..if it's..i don't know what number goes to which variables
Since velocity is constant, the object is in equilibrium: Forces in the x and y directions add to zero. The applied force has two components: Fx = F cos θ ; Fy = F sin θ (downward).

The forces on the object in the y direction are: Normal force (up); weight (down); applied force (down). They must balance:

N = mg + F sin θ

The forces on the object in the x direction are: Appplied force (to the right, say), friction (to the left). They too must balance:

F cos θ = N μ

Combine these equations eliminating "N", then rearrange so that "F" is on one side; see what conclusions you can draw.
 
Last edited:
so...m2 is 1.57 x 107 m..then what's m1..mass of Earth is that supposed to be given in the text too...and number 2..> 1.083..what's that...sorry to ask many questions..but i just don't know...oh my goodness I'm going crazy..with this physics stuff...
 
Last edited:
No, m2 is not 1.57 x 107 m. That is the height of the satellite above the Earth's surface, so the total distance from the center of Earth is R + H, and R should be given in your textbook. You don't have m2, the mass of the satallite, but you don't need it either in order to find the acceleration of it.

And [tex]1.083 = \sqrt{\frac{100\%}{85.3\%}}[/tex]
 
Chen said:
And [tex]1.083 = \sqrt{\frac{100\%}{85.3\%}}[/tex]
it's that the ratio for H/R ?
 
Last edited:
hyen84 said:
it's that the ratio for H/R ?
No. That equals 1 + H/r. See Chen's last equation in post #2. You can solve for H/r, right?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K