50K Ft/Lbs explosive pile driver

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter groundtester
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and construction of a cannon-like device intended to shoot a 100 lb steel slug into the ground with an impact energy between 20,000 to 50,000 ft/lbs. Participants explore various aspects of using black powder and other propellants, safety considerations, and the engineering challenges involved in achieving the desired energy output.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on the quantity of black powder needed to achieve the desired energy output, expressing familiarity with machining but not with explosives.
  • Another participant suggests that similar devices are used in oil exploration and geological mapping, questioning the original poster's intent.
  • Concerns are raised about the stability and safety of using black powder, with a recommendation for nitrocellulose-based propellants instead.
  • Participants discuss the energy release of explosives and the efficiency of different types of cannons, noting that efficiency can vary significantly.
  • There is a suggestion to consult textbooks on cannon construction to understand the relationship between explosive charge and barrel design.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the original poster's intentions but acknowledges their stated background as a government contractor.
  • The original poster clarifies their experience with black powder and expresses a desire to understand the forces involved in their project.
  • Another participant recommends contacting a specific resource for more detailed information on explosives, particularly for mining applications.
  • The original poster later seeks assistance in finding an engineer to help with the calculations and design aspects of the project.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of caution regarding the use of explosives and curiosity about the engineering challenges. There is no consensus on the best approach or materials to use, and multiple competing views on safety and design considerations remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various limitations, including the need for specific engineering calculations and the potential dangers associated with using explosives. The discussion also highlights the importance of safety and regulatory compliance in such projects.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals involved in engineering, explosives safety, mining applications, or those exploring the technical aspects of projectile motion and energy transfer in experimental setups.

groundtester
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A little or maybe its a lot, HELP! How do I go about getting the info to design a "cannon" probably black powder to shoot a 100 lb steel slug into the ground impacting between 20,0000 to 50,000 Ft / Lbs energy? I am a machinist and know how to implement the parts. I don't know where to start regarding the quantity of black powder say ffg grade or maybe a different charge? Ideally I would like to get up to the 50,000 lb mark. The 100 lb steel slug would be about a foot off the ground on rails and held to the Barrel with a 150 lb pressure release mechanism. Thanks in advance. Marc aka Groundtester
:rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't something like that used in oil exploration and geological underground structure mapping? Have you googled to try to find information about those test setups? Is that what you are trying to set up?

I don't think we have many explosives experts here on the PF, and even if we did, I doubt the Mentors would allow much in the way of explicit details of explosives construction and use to stay posted. That's a specialized subject with some unfortunate side uses that we would not want to be helping to promote experimentation with, if you understand what I mean.
 
I also will not get into much detail here, but I would seriously recommend against using black powder. It's unstable, and is ranked as a high rather than low explosive. Most propellant charges are nitrocellulose based, with grain structure and size tailored to the intended purpose. Here are a couple of commercial links that you can approach about your needs (if the Mods allow them to remain).
<< links removed by berkeman >>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Danger said:
(if the Mods allow them to remain).
<< links removed by berkeman >>

I'd prefer not to leave the links in the open forum, so I PM'ed the OP with your links, Danger. I know you're pretty careful with explosives, but I'm not too sure about the OP yet o:)
 
Good call. :approve:
 
I appreciate all your replys and yes the links are gone. I for sure understand being carefull with any explosive info. I am a government contractor (machine shop projects) and in the process of getting ATF licensed for this project. I don't want to post my cage number in this situation at this time. Of course you shouldn't believe me either, right. Ok I will check out the oil exploration advise. As far as black powder... ffg grade or black powder substitutes as Pyrodex are used all the time in Cannon Projectile Shoots for legitamate clubs and civil war reenactments. Again thanks for your time.
Marc
PS: also hold HAM Lic. KC8*** wish I had more time to use it.
 
50k ft-lb? 65-70 kJ, and explosives release 4-5 kJ/g. Partitioning of the energy released among noise, heating of barrel and surroundings, and actual mechanical work done on a projectile? If you call efficiency the ratio of mechanical energy to total release, it ranges from 0.3 - 0.5 as you move from small arms to 16" naval rifles. 30-50 g, which you can compare to the 4.5 g in a .45-70.
 
the best idea would probably be to take a look at a textbook on cannon's or a cheat sheet type of thing which would tell you how to construct the barrel dependent on the amount of explosive used, if following bystander's advice you made a cannon capable of using 50 grams of explosive, than you can be guaranteed to have a device capable of meeting your requirements.

out of curiosity what is the cannon going to be used for?
 
Since I'm not a Yank, I have no issues about what your motives are for wanting this; I take you at your word regarding the end purpose. I'm quite sure that if you were a terrorist, you wouldn't be asking such a rudimentary question here; you'd have far better nefarious sources. Nonetheless, I don't want to read about you blowing yourself up because of messing with stuff that you don't understand.
That having been said, if you are indeed a government contractor, you should have access to any number of explosives experts courtesy of that same government. You can call upon bomb squads, Special Forces teams from any branch of the military, or a tonne of CIA bagmen.
 
  • #10
Thanks again to all. are we talking about the same grams? Because 50 grams or about 2 oz. = about 875 grains black powder. That amount is the standard load for a small 2 inch Barrel by about 14" long to shoot a 10 oz ball about 800 yards when the barrel is at a 45 degree angle. As far as a Gov contractor calling on resources...only related to on their job and even then they subed it out due to their lack of resouces to begin with. I contacted the ATF but their info was limited to shock waves caused by certain amonts of ANFO. As far as getting blown up I appreciate your concern and every caution is taken. I do have a fair amount of experience with known guidelines for chamber size, steel type, wall thickness etc relative to the amount of black powder charge. I don't have any idea though of what's going on Force wise. I am going to the phone book tomorrow and will call some engineers and see where that leads. The device is for a long time customer in the mining business.
This is a brain teaser for me?
Thanks, Marc
PS: As far as an up to no good "person" unfortunatley there is way to much on the net and its not on this site anyway.
 
  • #11
I would recommend contacting CIL, then. The copy of their "Blaster's Handbook" that I have is over 30 years old, but chock full of info about all kinds of neat stuff. It's pretty much geared toward mining, but incudes stuff for more 'civilian' endeavours such as bridge-building.
 
  • #12
groundtester said:
Thanks again to all. are we talking about the same grams?

Yup.

Because 50 grams or about 2 oz. = about 875 grains black powder. That amount is the standard load for a small 2 inch Barrel by about 14" long to shoot a 10 oz ball about 800 yards when the barrel is at a 45 degree angle.

Sounds 'bout right.

As far as a Gov contractor calling on resources...only related to on their job and even then they subed it out due to their lack of resouces to begin with. I contacted the ATF but their info was limited to shock waves caused by certain amonts of ANFO. As far as getting blown up I appreciate your concern and every caution is taken. I do have a fair amount of experience with known guidelines for chamber size, steel type, wall thickness etc relative to the amount of black powder charge. I don't have any idea though of what's going on Force wise.

Energy -wise, or "force-wise?" The energy we've covered --- force comes in if you're looking at "burn rates" of black powder vs. nitrocellulose propellants; black powder "deflagrates" at ca. 500 m/s, and the reaction is all over soon's the "match" hits the touchhole (max barrel length to improve efficiency and range is 12' or so, depending on what source you choose). You sound like a blackpowder junkie --- ever played with black powder loads vs. modern propellants in late 19th century pieces? a la a Model 94 .32-40 or .38-55? Give you a feeling for "force" --- BP loads are NOT comfortable. 'Magine that's the attraction in seismic work --- nice sharp wave front.

I am going to the phone book tomorrow and will call some engineers and see where that leads. The device is for a long time customer in the mining business.
This is a brain teaser for me?
Thanks, Marc
PS: As far as an up to no good "person" unfortunatley there is way to much on the net and its not on this site anyway.
 
  • #13
Ok, I give up on doing my own figuring, past my scope, past the yellow pages scope. Does anyone know an engineer or someone I can pay to work the math or whatever it takes to do? Thanks, you can e-mail me please.