Help Finding Surface area with Double Integrals. (work shown)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the surface area of the function f(x,y)=√(x²+y²) above a specified region using double integrals. Participants explore the setup of the integral, the correct limits of integration, and the conversion from Cartesian to polar coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the formula for surface area and attempts to set up the double integral, initially suggesting the answer should be in terms of θ.
  • Another participant questions the appropriateness of obtaining an answer in terms of a dummy variable, suggesting it should be a numerical value instead.
  • A later reply identifies two errors in the initial setup: the region of integration is incorrectly defined as only the first quadrant, and the change of variables correction is missing when converting to polar coordinates.
  • Participants discuss the necessity of including the variable r in the integral after the change of coordinates.
  • There is a suggestion that integrating from 0 to 2π would yield the correct area for the entire circular region, rather than just the first quadrant.
  • One participant expresses confusion about their integral resulting in a factor of 1/4, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the limits of integration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the initial setup of the integral contains errors, particularly regarding the limits of integration and the inclusion of the Jacobian factor. However, there is no consensus on the final numerical answer, as different participants arrive at different results.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the initial misinterpretation of the region of integration and the omission of necessary factors when transitioning to polar coordinates. The discussion reflects ongoing adjustments and corrections without reaching a definitive conclusion.

KSCphysics
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
find the surface area of [tex]f(x,y)=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/tex] above the region
[tex]R=\{(x,y):0\leq f(x,y) \leq 1\}[/tex]

well.. here's what the answer should be.. [tex]\sqrt{2} \ \theta[/tex]

1. formula for Surface area:
[tex]\int_{R} \int \sqrt{1+f_{x}(x,y)^2+f_{y}(x,y)^2} \ dA[/tex]

2. next i need to find the region:
so if [tex]r^2=x^2+y^2[/tex]
then... [tex]r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/tex]
which means that our region is from
[tex]0 \leq r \leq 1[/tex]
and we know [tex]0 \leq \theta \leq \frac{\Pi}{2}[/tex]

3. [tex]f_{x}(x,y)=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}[/tex] [tex]f_{y}(x,y)=\frac{y}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}[/tex]


4. [tex]\int_{0}^\frac{\Pi}{2} \int_{0}^1 \sqrt{1+(\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}})^2+(\frac{y}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}})^2} \ dr \ d\theta[/tex]

so [tex]\int_{0}^\frac{\Pi}{2} \int_{0}^1 \sqrt{2} \ dr d\theta[/tex]


somehow... something doesn't work... HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait, you're going to get an answer in terms of a dummy variable theta?

cookiemonster
 
no i should get a Number.

oops the answer is sqrt(2) * Pi not sqrt(2) * theta
 
Okay. You have two errors.

First off, the area you're integrating over is slightly off. You're only integrating over the quarter circle in the first quadrant. 0<f(x,y)<1 in an entire circular region of radius one.

Second off, you forgot to add the change of variables correction when you changed from Cartesian to Polar coordinates. So there should be one more thing in the integral along with the sqrt(2).

cookiemonster
 
is that one more thing the r in the r dr dtheta?
 
You bet.

cookiemonster
 
your pretty smart... are you a professor? or teacher?
 
hrm.. tried it.. now i get (sqrt(2)*Pi)/4
 
I'm a lowly student...

What's your integral? I checked the answer and I got pi*Sqrt(2).

The 1/4 seems to indicate that you might still be integrating only the first quadrant.

cookiemonster
 
  • #10
so i should integrate 0<Theta<2*Pi?
 
  • #11
Well, yes... That is a full circle.

Remember that 0<f(x,y)<1 stipulates that the region to be integrated over has radius 1. And since we've got x^2 and y^2, it doesn't matter whether x or y is positive or negative. They both end up positive anyway.

Integrating to pi/2 only yields a quarter of the circle. The quarter in the 1st quadrant, in particular.

Anyway, since the whole thing is isotropic, you can literally just take the integral where you used 0 to pi/2 and multiply it by 4 to get the integral for 0 to 2pi. So the problem's done!

cookiemonster
 
  • #12
i see.. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K