Lagrange ' s equations for spring problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter student1938
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrange Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving two masses connected by springs on a frictionless table, analyzed using Lagrange's equations. Participants are exploring the kinetic and potential energy formulations, as well as the definitions of coordinates related to the system's equilibrium positions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish the kinetic and potential energy expressions for the system using generalized coordinates. Some participants question the inclusion of the springs' rest lengths and suggest alternative formulations for potential energy. Others seek clarification on the definitions of the coordinates used in the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in refining the energy expressions and clarifying the definitions of the coordinates. There is a recognition of the need to define the rest lengths of the springs, and some guidance has been offered regarding the formulation of the Lagrangian. However, there is no explicit consensus on the definitions or the energy expressions yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the assumptions regarding the rest lengths of the springs and how they relate to the defined coordinates. The original poster's definitions of the coordinates are being scrutinized for clarity and correctness.

student1938
Messages
91
Reaction score
1
Ok, there are two objects of mass m on a frictionless table. The 2 masses are connected to the other by a spring of spring constant k. One mass is connected to a wall with a spring of the same constant k. Solve for the motion using Lagrange' s equations.

I used generalized coordinates x starting from the centre of the mass closer to the wall and y starting from the center of the mass farthest from the wall. I get T = (1/2)mxdot ^ 2 + (1/2)mydot ^ 2

V = (1/2)kx ^ 2 +(1/2)k(x-y) ^ 2

I know that this contains cross terms but uptill this stage , is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's fine, except you didn't include the rest lenghts of the springs. If we stick with your notation, let's use xo as the rest length of the 1st spring and yo as the rest length of the second spring. Kinetic coenergy is the same:
[tex]T^* = \frac 1 2 m\dot{x}^2 + \frac 1 2 m\dot{y}^2[/tex]
Potential energy looks more like this:
[tex]V = \frac 1 2 k\left(x-x_o\right)^2 + \frac 1 2 k\left(y-x-y_o\right)^2[/tex]

Don't worry about simplfying any algebra at this point; just right L = T*-V and start differentiating away (or, as one of my buddies used to say, Lagrangiate). Have fun.
 
Couldn' t I take x0, y0 to be zero?
 
Yes, provided that you define your coordinates properly. I thought you had defined the distances from the wall. I just re-read your post and I think I'm wrong about that, but I'm still not quite sure.

To avoid any ambiguity:
Let x = the distance of the first mass (the one closer to the wall) measured from the original position of that mass (its position when the system is in equilibrium).
and similarly:
Let y = the distance of the second mass (the one farthest from the wall) measured from the original position of that mass (its position when the system is in equilibrium).

That may have been what you originally meant, but I didn't read it that way. Sorry for any confusion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K