Calculating Concentration of MnO4 Solution Using Spectrophotometry

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benzoate
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the concentration of a MnO4- solution with an absorbance of 0.330 at 525 nm, the relationship between absorbance and concentration is used, following the formula A(1)/A(2) = c(1)/c(2). Given a known concentration of 0.390 mM (or 0.390 x 10^-3 M) and absorbance of 0.585, the concentration of the unknown solution is calculated to be approximately 2.20 x 10^-9 M. However, there is a critical error in the unit conversion, as 0.390 mM should be represented as 0.390 x 10^-3 M, not 10^-9 M. The linear relationship between concentration and absorbance is assumed, which is typical in spectrophotometry. Accurate unit conversion is essential for correct calculations in this context.
Benzoate
Messages
418
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a 0.390 mM solution of MnO41- has an absorbance of 0.585 at 525 nm in a 1.000 cm cell. What is the concentration of a MnO41- solution that has absorbance of 0.330 in the same cell at that wavelength?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



c(1) =concentration =.390 *10^-9 M
wavelength = 525*10^-9 m
pathlength = 1*10^-2 m
A(1)= absorbance = .585
A(2) = .330

I think the wavelength and pathlength are irrelevant to finding the concentration of (MnO4)1-

A(1)/A(2)= c(1)/c(2) => c(2)=c(1)*A(2)/A(1)

C(2)= (.330) *(.390*10^-9)/(.585) = 2.20*10^-9
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have it; at least symbolically. Your constants substituted look good also.
...
Now, how do you know that the concentration and absorbance are in a linear relationship (they probably are.)?
 
It looks good except that a millimolar (mM) is 10^-3 moles/liter not 10^-9 moles/liter.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top