What Secrets Will the Oseberg Exhumation Reveal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter arildno
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Oseberg ship burial and the potential insights that may arise from the exhumation of the remains of two women buried in 834 CE. Participants explore the historical significance of the burial, the condition of the remains, and the implications of DNA analysis on understanding the ancestry and life of these individuals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight the historical context of the Oseberg burial and the significance of the findings related to Queen Asa and her ancestry.
  • There is mention of the challenges associated with DNA extraction from ancient remains, with some expressing concerns about the preservation of the material since the 1948 re-burial.
  • One participant notes the discovery of mtDNA U7 in the younger woman, referencing a previously reported but later refuted claim regarding DNA origins.
  • Another participant engages with a pun related to the term "grave doubts," drawing a literary connection to Shakespeare.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of appreciation for the research efforts and skepticism regarding the reliability of some findings, particularly concerning the DNA evidence. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of the DNA analysis and the overall preservation of the remains.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the preservation of the remains and the accuracy of DNA analysis, as well as the dependence on historical narratives that may not be fully substantiated.

arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
10,135
Reaction score
138
The arguably greatest Viking ship burial ever, the Oseberg find from 1904, is yet again in the news here in Norway.

In 1948, the remains of the two women originally buried in 834 CE were put to rest again in an aluminium coffin within a stone sarcophagus.
Some bones were kept for research purposes, but since extraction of DNA from bone is a chancy procedure, researchers have wanted to exhume the remains once again.

Not the least because there were grave doubts as to whether the 1948 re-burial would have preserved the material.

Those doubts were strengthened considerably when it was found that water and dirt had seeped into the sarcophagus, but on opening the coffin, the remains were still intact and dry.

However, researchers say that only within a few years from now, that would not have been the case..



The oldest woman, about 70 years of age at her death, is commonly regarded to have been Queen Asa, the grandmother of Harald Hairfair, who united Norway at the end of the 9th century.

From the material that were kept from 1948, some very interesting discoveries have already been made:

1. Strontium analysis of a tooth revealed that the old woman had her upbringing and life in the Kristiansand area in Southern Norway, in full conformity with saga description of Asa's life (Oseberg lies in Vestfold, quite a bit north of the region of her upbringing)

2. Even more interesting was some slender DNA evidence that her ancestors most likely came from the region around the Black Sea, which is in agreement with the previously thought mythical pre-history of the Norwegian old royal line, the Ynglings.



Most likely, with more matter now to work on, researchers can make further interesting discoveries about the two women buried, and the times in which they lived.


:smile:
 
Science news on Phys.org
Kudos to the researchers who exhumed the remains before they were damaged.
Wikipedia quotes this discovery of DNA origins of one of the women, later refuted.

The remains of the younger of the two women buried with the Oseberg Ship were tested and discovered to have mtDNA of U7.

Follow the Oseberg Ship link for information discovered about the Viking vessel or this link directly to discussion of the two human remains.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
arildno said:
Not the least because there were grave doubts as to whether the 1948 re-burial would have preserved the material.
:smile:

grave doubts :cool:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: epenguin and Klystron
cosmik debris said:
grave doubts :cool:
The OP is in good company with that pun. Shakespeare has Romeo's friend Mercutio refer to himself as a 'grave man' after being stabbed by Juliet's kin.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: epenguin

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
811
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K