## quick question about multiple integrals

i was looking through a book and came across a double integral that was split into the product of two single integrals.

it was int (x^n)(y^n ) dxdy split into (int x^n dx)(int y^n dy)

i just finished a course in multivariable calculus(it was by no means thorough), and i didn't know that you could do this.

is this a general rule? a typo? a special case?

 PhysOrg.com mathematics news on PhysOrg.com >> Pendulum swings back on 350-year-old mathematical mystery>> Bayesian statistics theorem holds its own - but use with caution>> Math technique de-clutters cancer-cell data, revealing tumor evolution, treatment leads
 i think thats just like how a constant comes out of the integrand in single variable integration. since you can treat x^n as a constant with respect to int(y^n*x^n)dy and vice versa you can break it up. of course though you can't brake up integrals over products of the functions of the variable you're integrating over.
 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus That's "Fubini's theorem" and I would have thought it would be a fundamental part of any multi-variable calculus class (sure you didn't nod off during that class?). $$\int_a^b \int_c^d f(x)g(y) dy dx= \int_a^b f(x)\left[\int_c^d g(y)dy\right]dx$$ because f(x) depends only on x and is treated like a constant in the "dy" integral. Of course, with constant limits of integeration, $$\int_c^d g(y)dy$$, is just a constant, not depending on x, and can be taken out of the "dx" integral: $$\int_a^b \int_c^d f(x)g(y) dydx= \left[\int_a^b f(x)dx\right]\left[\int_c^d g(y)dy\right]$$. Notice that I added the constant limits of integration which you did not have in your integral: that's important. If the limits of integration on the "dy" integral depend on x, you cannot do that: $$\int_a^b \int_{\phi(x)}^{\psi(x)} f(x)g(y)dy dx\ne \left[\int_a^b f(x)dx\right]\left[\int_{\phi(x)}^{\psi(x)}g(y)dy\right]$$ since the expression on the left would be a number while the expression on the right will be a function of x.

## quick question about multiple integrals

no...didn't nod off in class...it's community college, they even skipped the whole section on infinite series...go figure

but thanks, that makes sense now. i just didn't get that it's a consequence of switching the order of integration. it wasn't immediately obvious to me.

 Quote by mongoose no...didn't nod off in class...it's community college, they even skipped the whole section on infinite series...go figure but thanks, that makes sense now. i just didn't get that it's a consequence of switching the order of integration. it wasn't immediately obvious to me.
no offense, really don't be offended, but ****ty teachers is no excuse for not learning a subject thoroughly. and you'll do well if you remember this.
 hey...maybe that's why i'm asking questions!...duh!

 Similar discussions for: quick question about multiple integrals Thread Forum Replies Calculus & Beyond Homework 0 Calculus & Beyond Homework 3 General Math 4 Calculus & Beyond Homework 5 Calculus 1