Continuity of Dirichlet looking function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(x) defined as f(x) = x for rational x and f(x) = 0 for irrational x is not continuous at any point c ≠ 0. This conclusion is reached by demonstrating that the limit of f(x) as x approaches c through rational numbers equals c, while the limit through irrational numbers equals 0. The density of rational and irrational numbers in the real numbers R is crucial to this proof, as it allows for sequences of both types to approach any given point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of rational and irrational numbers
  • Familiarity with the concept of continuity in functions
  • Basic proof techniques in real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of density in real numbers
  • Learn about the formal definition of continuity
  • Explore sequences and their limits in calculus
  • Investigate proofs involving irrational numbers and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Students in undergraduate mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis or calculus, as well as educators seeking to explain concepts of continuity and limits.

teleport
Messages
240
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Where is the function f(x) continuous?

f(x) =
x, if x is rational

0, if x is irrational

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Is this correct?: I approach some c =/= 0, 1st through x's that are rational
and prove there is the limit c, and then approach through x's that are irrational and prove that the limit now cannot be c, that now I can conclude that the limit at c does not exist, and hence the function is not continuous at any c=/=0?

If no, why, and in what other way must I solve it then? If yes, please try to explain as rigourously as you can why this can be done. Remind you though, don't get technical above 2nd year in which I am. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have it right. If you approach through irrationals, the limit is always zero. Which is not equal to c unless c=0. There's not really much to get technical about beyond the statement that both the rationals and irrationals are dense in R.
 
Well you just did! Sorry, but by dense you mean that: for any pair of irrationals there is a rational between them, and the same the other way? This is what I vaguely remember I read some day on the web. How is it that dense implies you can do that? Thanks again.
 
A set S is dense if for any x you can find an s in S that is as close to x as you want. Which would let you say for any x you can find a sequence of rationals approaching it and a sequence of irrationals. Do you think you are expected to prove that?
 
No way! But how is it that the rationals and irrational are proven to be dense?
 
just basically showing that the limit as s in S approaches x is x itself, and that's it?
 
The proof depends on how you define an irrational number and can be sort of 'technical'. But try this, if x is rational, then {x+sqrt(2)/n} is a sequence of irrationals approaching x. If you think of an irrational in terms of it's decimal expansion then for example sqrt(2) is the limit of the sequence 1,1.4,1.41,1.414,... Each term in the series adds one more decimal place to the expansion and each term in the series is rational. How's that for 2nd year level?
 
Sweet! :) Even my neighbor can get that. I'll go there now and show it to him (joking). Thanks so much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K