Register to reply

Proof of Odd functions' Continuity

by bjgawp
Tags: continuity, functions, proof
Share this thread:
bjgawp
#1
Oct18-07, 10:03 PM
P: 84
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
If an odd function g(x) is right-continuous at x = 0, show that it is continuous at x = 0 and that g(0) = 0. Hint: Prove first that [tex]\lim_{x \to 0^{-}} g(x) [/tex] exists and equals to [tex]\lim_{x \to 0^{+}} g(-x)[/tex]


2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution
Suppose [tex]\lim_{x \to 0^{-}} g(x) = M[/tex] Let [tex]\epsilon[/tex] > 0. We must find [tex]\delta[/tex] > 0 such that whenever [tex]-\delta[/tex] < x < 0, it follows that |g(x) - M | < [tex]\epsilon[/tex]. We know that -x < [tex]\delta[/tex] but relating this to f(-x) is where I'm stuck. Like the other problem I posted, I can't see what the end result is supposed to be. Any help would be very much appreciated!
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
qspeechc
#2
Oct19-07, 05:12 AM
P: 792
I think your attempted solution takes it too far! For an odd function f(-x) = -f(x), that should be enough to get your proof.
bjgawp
#3
Oct19-07, 10:00 PM
P: 84
Hmm I think I do have to incorporate epsilon delta proofs in this one. I was thinking that since -g(x) = g(-x) then |-g(x)| = |g(-x)|. And since we're proving that the limit of odd continuous functions have a limit at 0 (I think that's a safe assumption) then:
Given [tex]\epsilon>0[/tex]. [tex]\exists\delta >0[/tex] such that whenever 0 < |x| < [tex]\delta[/tex] it follows that |g(x) - M| < [tex]\epsilon[/tex]. Since M = 0, then [tex]|g(x)|<\epsilon[/tex]. (All this is the function approaching 0 from the left)

Then looking at g(-x), for the same epsilon and delta (since the definition of odd functions implies symmetry about the origin) we arrive at the same conclusion |g(x)| < [tex]\epsilon[/tex].

Do I seem to be on the right track or is this just dead wrong? It's difficult making the transition from concrete, repetitive epsilon-delta proofs to more general and abstract ones. The methods don't quite seem to be the same ...


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Continuity & Properties of functions Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Continuity of functions Calculus 7
Continuity with piecewise functions. Calculus & Beyond Homework 8
Continuity of Trig Functions Calculus 4
Functions, Continuity Introductory Physics Homework 4