Thread Closed

number theory problem

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Oct30-07, 12:14 AM   #1
 

number theory problem


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Prove that

[tex] \frac{1}{p} c(p,n) = (-1)^{n-1}/n (mod p) [/tex]

I expanded that combination in every way I could think and I tried to use Wilson's Theorem and I couldn't get :(


2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel
>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
Oct30-07, 09:54 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
That's p choose n, right?

Try writing the LHS out as a fraction with the stuff in the numerator as negative representatives. It should nicely cancel to give the result.
Oct30-07, 11:07 AM   #3
 
What do you mean "negative representatives"?
Oct30-07, 11:33 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

number theory problem


-(p-1)/2, -(p-2)/2,..., -1 for odd p
Oct30-07, 11:53 AM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
What is 1/n, or -1/n mod p supposed to mean?
Oct31-07, 08:22 AM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by matt grime View Post
What is 1/n, or -1/n mod p supposed to mean?
Usually those would be the multiplicative inverses of n and -n respectively.
Oct31-07, 04:04 PM   #7
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Usually? I beg to differ. Writing 1/n would indicate that the OP hasn't grasped what's going on. As would the fact there is an equals sign. I can't think of anyone who writes 1/2 mod 3 and not -1 0 it is incredibly bad notation. There is a difference from what I infer and what the OP ought to have written.
Nov1-07, 11:23 AM   #8
 
What does OP stand for? Is that me?

I just realized that my book my book defines congruence as

[tex] x \equiv y \mod p [/tex]

when x-y is a rational number whose numerator, in reduced form, is divisible by p.

So, it is like a generalized congruence or something...

Are there different rules for these generalized congruences?

I am not sure why what Gokul43201 wrote cancels nicely?
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: number theory problem
Thread Forum Replies
Number theory problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
number theory problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Help for Number Theory problem Linear & Abstract Algebra 2
number theory problem Precalculus Mathematics Homework 6
a problem of number theory General Math 6