Can Pure Math Experience a Paradigm Shift Without Experimental Validation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Organic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shift
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of a paradigm shift in pure mathematics, exploring whether such a shift can occur without experimental validation, as is typical in physics. Participants examine the nature of paradigm shifts, the role of creativity and usefulness in mathematics, and the philosophical implications of changes in mathematical understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Philosophical exploration
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a paradigm shift in pure mathematics relies on deep changes in fundamental concepts such as definitions, logic, and axioms.
  • Others argue that revolutionary views on the philosophy of mathematics involve new perspectives on ontology, formalism, and epistemology.
  • A participant questions what tests a new theory must pass for a paradigm shift to occur in pure mathematics, suggesting that usefulness may be a criterion.
  • Creative thinking is highlighted as a precursor to a paradigm shift, with the assertion that mathematics follows creative insights rather than leading them.
  • Some participants discuss the influence of historical figures and movements, such as Bourbaki, on the evolution of mathematical thought.
  • There is a suggestion that if all knowledge is fundamentally mathematical, then creativity plays a crucial role in shifting paradigms.
  • A later reply mentions that a new physics paradigm has emerged, which challenges the capacity of mathematics to represent the universe's processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of paradigm shifts in mathematics, with no consensus reached. Some emphasize the importance of creativity and usefulness, while others focus on philosophical aspects. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the criteria for a paradigm shift in pure mathematics.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of experimental validation in mathematics compared to physics, and the dependence on subjective interpretations of creativity and usefulness in the context of paradigm shifts.

Organic
Messages
1,223
Reaction score
0
Hi,

A Paradigm Shift happens in physics mostly when fundamental concepts of some system are deeply changed by a new theory and/or new experimental results that supporting and/or triggering a new theory for enough long time.

Pure Mathematics has no experimental side like physics, therefore a Paradigm shift depends
on deep changes of our understanding fundamental concepts like: definition, logic, axiom, number, set, operation, limit, function, infinity and so on.

My question is this, because there are no experiments that determine the validity of some theory, what kind of tests can some new theory has to “pass” until a paradigm shift really happens in Pure Math?

Another question on the same subject:

What do you think is the “nature” of a paradigm shift in a pure theoretical system?

Thank you,

Organic
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Revolutionary views on the philosophy of mathematics inevitably involve a novel perspective on the ontology of maths, the formalism of maths, and the epistemology of maths. These are the three major issues of mathematics.
 
Organic said:
Hi,

A Paradigm Shift happens in physics mostly when fundamental concepts of some system are deeply changed by a new theory and/or new experimental results that supporting and/or triggering a new theory for enough long time.
...

Here is a great page about Thomas Kuhn ("The Structure of Scientific Revolutions", 1962) and his ideas

http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/Kuhnsnap.html
 
Dear marcus,

I really want to know what do you think about a paradigm shift in pure mathematics?
 
Last edited:
Hi Stevo,
Revolutionary views on the philosophy of mathematics inevitably involve a novel perspective on the ontology of maths, the formalism of maths, and the epistemology of maths. These are the three major issues of mathematics.
Can you give an example of this novel perspective?
 
My question is this, because there are no experiments that determine the validity of some theory, what kind of tests can some new theory has to ?pass? until a paradigm shift really happens in Pure Math?

Usefulness.
 
"creative thinking"

Creative thoughts lead to a "Paradigm Shift" The mathematics come later. Is not mathematics proofs of what is already known.
 
Hi Hurkyl,
Hurkyl said:
Usefulness.
And what if a paradigm shift in some language (and Math is first of all a form of language) includes in it the meaning of "Usefulness"?
 
Last edited:
Rader,
Creative thoughts lead to a "Paradigm Shift" The mathematics come later.
Do you mean that a paradigm shift starting (in some sence) out of what is called mathematical system?
 
  • #10
Organic said:
Hi Stevo,

Can you give an example of this novel perspective?

Bourbaki are one of the most infamous.
 
  • #11
And the modern trend away from Bourbaki, too, mainly coming from the pedagogical influence in the last 30 years. (The let 2=n school.)
 
  • #12
Organic said:
Rader,

Do you mean that a paradigm shift starting (in some sence) out of what is called mathematical system?

If all knowledge was in essence, mathematics, the answer would be yes. Although mathematical proofs exits, of things we are not sure exist, are they anything more than creativity? If all knowledge was in essece "Reality" mathematics would be a subset of it. Creativity seems to be a sign of genius, at least, that is what I have learned from history. Thats why I posted what I did. Creativity would be a tapping of that database, to change the paradigm, mathematics would be one of its finer tools.

That is the way I see it to be, mine being a world view of a non-mathematician.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
The paradigm shift in physics has already occurred, see http://paradigm.blogharbor.com

Mathematics was not capable of representing the true quantitative nature of the process of the Universe.

This new physics paradigm, through symmetry across the sub-atomic/atomic and biology domains, integrates science.

Stephen Mooney
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
929
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K