Understanding Inert Bodies: Newton and Archimedes' Equations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter deda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    bodies
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the principles of force and mass as described by Newton and Archimedes, exploring the differences between their approaches to mechanics and statics. It examines the implications of their equations and concepts in both static and dynamic contexts, as well as the foundational aspects of physics they represent.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents Newton's equation relating force, mass, and acceleration, suggesting that mass influences how far a body can be thrown, while also discussing the equal and opposite forces between two stones of different masses.
  • Another participant contrasts Archimedes' principles of equilibrium with Newton's dynamics, asserting that statics is time-independent and relies on force equilibrium, while dynamics is time-dependent and involves force nonequilibrium.
  • A participant questions the definitions and relationships between distances D_1 and D_2 in the context of Archimedes' equations, seeking clarification on the mathematical justification for their proportionality.
  • Another participant responds by asserting that D_1 and D_2 are related through a constant k, which is derived from the forces and masses involved, indicating that D_i represents distances from the center of a lever.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the foundational principles of physics as proposed by Archimedes and Newton, with no consensus reached on the superiority or correctness of either approach. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of their respective theories.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of variables and the mathematical relationships presented, particularly concerning the distances and their implications in the context of force equilibrium and dynamics.

deda
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Newton says: “A body accelerates proportionally with the force it carries and reciprocally to its mass”. His equation is:
[tex]\frac {F}{m} = \frac {d^2x}{dt^2}[/tex]
So, what Newton does is consider the position changing while time goes by and while the force and mass remain constant. Conclusively, if the stone is lighter I can throw it further away. This way the mass becomes criterion for how inert one body is. But if the lighter and the heavier stone throw each other then they will do it with equal and opposite forces. So:
[tex]F_1 = -F_2 <=> \frac {M_1}{M_2} = - \frac {a_1}{a_2}[/tex]
[tex]\frac {F_1}{M_1} <> \frac {F_2}{M_2}<=> a_1 <> a_2[/tex]

Archimedes says: “Magnitudes are in equilibrium on reciprocally proportional distances from the center”. His equation is:
[tex]\frac {F_1}{F_2} = \frac {D_2}{D_1} = \frac {M_1}{M_2}[/tex]
And if the forces and masses are again constant then:
[tex]\frac {F_1}{F_2} = \frac {dD_2}{dD_1} = \frac {M_1}{M_2}[/tex]
So, the heavier body will carry more force and will pass smaller distance. Actually the fact that the mass is criterion for how inert one body is comes from Archimedes. Among the differences between the two physics, Archimedes’s one is time - independent.

I tell you: Our physics starts with Archimedes and that physics takes wrong direction when little Newton comes up with his mirage. We cannot blame the kids because they tell the truth even when they lie, yet we cannot consider them seriously.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The key to fully understanding the different principles working behind Archimedes' level and Newton's mechanics is to know the difference between statics of force and dynamics of force.

Statics deals with the equilibrium of forces. This is time independent. Intrinsically, the concept of mass must be described by this method of force equilibrium. The math is the integral calculus which by no coincidence is discovered by Archimedes before it was attributed to Leibniz. This is the quantum nature of the Hamiltonian function.

Dynamics deals with the nonequilibrium of forces. This is time dependent. Intrinsically, the concept of electric charge must be described by this method of force nonequilibrium. The math is the differential calculus and invented by Newton to deal with this method of analysis. This is the beginning of the Lagrangian function and gauge symmetry.
 
You don't say what D_1 and D_2 are and don't justify why it is that

dD_1/dD_2 = D_1/D_2

which would state that

log(D_1) = log(D_2) + K, ie D_1=kD_2

whatever D_i might be obviously.
 
So what?
D_1 = k * D_2
and
k = F_2 / F_1 = M_2 / M_1 = const

D_i is a distance from the center of the lever.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
11K