MLK plagiarized his dissertation and cheated on his wife.


by gravenewworld
Tags: cheated, dissertation, plagiarized, wife
gravenewworld
gravenewworld is offline
#1
Jan21-08, 04:19 PM
P: 1,389
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_...horship_issues


So why is MLK allowed to plagiarize and not get his PhD revoked when any other regular PhD would have their head roll if they got caught plagiarizing?

Cheated on his wife?-

http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/mlking.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.

However, in 1989, Ralph Abernathy, a close associate of King's in the civil right movement, stated in a book he authored that King was a womanizer. The book was titled And The Walls Came Tumbling Down, and was published by Harper & Row. The book was reviewed in The New York Times on October 29, 1989, and the allegations of King's sexual conduct were discussed in that review, where Abernathy says that he only wrote the term womanizing, and did not specifically say King had extramarital sex.[49] Also, evidence indicating that King possibly engaged in sexual affairs is detailed by history professor David Garrow in his book Bearing the Cross: Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, published in 1986 by William Morrow & Company; though it was not proven whether he agreed to have sex with a woman the night before his assassination.

So is MLK really the saint he is cracked up to be?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
NASA's space station Robonaut finally getting legs
Free the seed: OSSI nurtures growing plants without patent barriers
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
Evo
Evo is offline
#2
Jan21-08, 04:28 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 25,940
Quote Quote by gravenewworld View Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_...horship_issues


So why is MLK allowed to plagiarize and not get his PhD revoked when any other regular PhD would have their head roll if they got caught plagiarizing?

Cheated on his wife?-

http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/mlking.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.




So is MLK really the saint he is cracked up to be?
It's not that he's a saint, it's what he did in helping blacks gain equality.
gravenewworld
gravenewworld is offline
#3
Jan21-08, 04:37 PM
P: 1,389
Quote Quote by Evo View Post
It's not that he's a saint, it's what he did in helping blacks gain equality.
And Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton don't help Blacks gain equality? Is MLK really that much different than them?

drankin
drankin is offline
#4
Jan21-08, 04:42 PM
drankin's Avatar
P: 175

MLK plagiarized his dissertation and cheated on his wife.


MLK had an enormous vision and purpose that created an amazing catalyst to help black Americans achieve their deserved Constitutional equality.

At the same time he was just another human being like the rest of us. I never thought of him as a Saint (in the Catholic context). But he was a great man none-the-less.
drankin
drankin is offline
#5
Jan21-08, 04:44 PM
drankin's Avatar
P: 175
Quote Quote by gravenewworld View Post
And Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton don't help Blacks gain equality? Is MLK really that much different than them?
I can't imagine that MLK would have hung out with those guys.
gravenewworld
gravenewworld is offline
#6
Jan21-08, 04:45 PM
P: 1,389
So no one can explain why MLK is allowed to get away with BLATANT plagiarism? Any other PhD would instantly have their degree revoked for a fraction of the amount of plagiarism that MLK did.
Benzoate
Benzoate is offline
#7
Jan21-08, 04:56 PM
P: 569
Quote Quote by gravenewworld View Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_...horship_issues


So why is MLK allowed to plagiarize and not get his PhD revoked when any other regular PhD would have their head roll if they got caught plagiarizing?

Cheated on his wife?-

http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/mlking.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.




So is MLK really the saint he is cracked up to be?
Thomas Jefferson isn't really a saint either , seeing that he cheated on his wife with his slave , and then had a child out of wedlock; but that is independent of what influence his treatise , the declaration of Independence had on many colonists to help form the republic the United States we now know to today. Half of the signers of the constitutions did not always practice what they preach(civil liberties for all the , except slaves, women were excluding from reeking from the benefits the constitution offer), but that does not mean that the constitution wasn't a great document , or the men did not do anything original in taking human rights to the next level , and sweeping feudalism and countries ruled by kings/queens under the rug
Benzoate
Benzoate is offline
#8
Jan21-08, 04:57 PM
P: 569
Quote Quote by gravenewworld View Post
So no one can explain why MLK is allowed to get away with BLATANT plagiarism? Any other PhD would instantly have their degree revoked for a fraction of the amount of plagiarism that MLK did.
Did he plagarigize all of his speeches
drankin
drankin is offline
#9
Jan21-08, 05:00 PM
drankin's Avatar
P: 175
So, why didn't his Phd get revoked? I imagine it would be a very unpopular thing to do now. I say, big deal. He's not known for his faults and in contrast to his accomplishments, who cares.
Benzoate
Benzoate is offline
#10
Jan21-08, 05:02 PM
P: 569
Quote Quote by gravenewworld View Post
And Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton don't help Blacks gain equality? Is MLK really that much different than them?
I'm a black person , and I can say that Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton did NOT help blacks gain equality. Equality for blacks ,was pretty much established , before those two hucksters join the game.Although equality between blacks and whites are not perfect, Malcolm X and MLK are the activists that pushed for blacks to having voting rights, and To be able to enter public/private places without having the skin color questioned. Sharpton and Jackson are out for the own personal agendas/
turbo
turbo is offline
#11
Jan21-08, 05:14 PM
PF Gold
turbo's Avatar
P: 7,367
MLK was not a saint, but he was a visionary. He managed to mobilize resistance to racist practices (legal and illegal) in a time and place when resistance to such practices could earn you a severe beating, jail time, or lynching. How many people would mobilize to march for basic human rights when they knew that they would be facing police dogs, riot police, fire hoses, etc?
Ivan Seeking
Ivan Seeking is offline
#12
Jan21-08, 05:50 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Ivan Seeking's Avatar
P: 12,493
Quote Quote by drankin View Post
I can't imagine that MLK would have hung out with those guys.
IIRC, Jackson was standing right next to King when he was shot.
Hurkyl
Hurkyl is offline
#13
Jan21-08, 06:04 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Hurkyl's Avatar
P: 16,101
How reliable is Snopes as a source for this kind of thing?
OmCheeto
OmCheeto is offline
#14
Jan21-08, 06:05 PM
PF Gold
OmCheeto's Avatar
P: 1,370
Quote Quote by drankin View Post
So, why didn't his Phd get revoked? I imagine it would be a very unpopular thing to do now. I say, big deal. He's not known for his faults and in contrast to his accomplishments, who cares.
He taught me to judge people by the content of their character. Something my parents never did. I agree, I really don't care about his faults. He changed me, and that's a lot more important than who he buggered. And another thing; stealing from one is plagiarism, stealing from many is research.
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/mlking.asp

Westling also accepted the committee's statement that "no thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree from Boston University" and the assertion that despite its flaws, the dissertation "makes an intelligent contribution to scholarship."

The investigatory committee, comprising three professors in the BU School of Theology and one from American University, was appointed by Westling last November after researchers at Stanford said they had discovered numerous instances of plagiarism in King's work as a graduate student.

While there was general agreement that King acted improperly, Clayborne Carson, head of the King Papers Project at Stanford where the plagiarism initially was uncovered, noted that King made no effort to conceal what he was doing, providing grounds for a belief that King was not willfully engaged in wrongdoing.
So if King had simply put in proper references to parts of his paper, we wouldn't be having this argument.

And if Hoover hadn't been such a.... I don't even have a word for Hoover.
We probably would have never found out that he was guilty of the same thing as 25 - 60% of husbands in America.

http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/mlking.asp
Of course, J. Edgar Hoover became preoccupied with Martin's private life early in the civil rights movement, and this preoccupation was a significant factor in Hoover's pathological hatred of him and the movement he headed. Early in the game the FBI began to bug our various hotel rooms, hoping to discover our strategy but also to gather evidence that could be used against Martin personally.

I remember in particular a stay at the Willard Hotel in Washington, where they not only put in audio receivers, but video equipment as well. Then, after collecting enough of this "evidence" to be useful, they began to distribute it to reporters, law officers, and other people in a position to hurt us. Finally, when no one would do Hoover's dirty work for him, someone in the FBI put together a tape of highly intimate moments and sent them to Martin. Unfortunately and perhaps this was deliberate [his wife] Coretta received the tape and played it first. But such accusations never seemed to touch her. She rose above all the petty attempts to damage their marriage by refusing to even entertain such thoughts.
drankin
drankin is offline
#15
Jan21-08, 06:08 PM
drankin's Avatar
P: 175
Quote Quote by Ivan Seeking View Post
IIRC, Jackson was standing right next to King when he was shot.
LOL, those guys are old enough I figured one of them probably knew him personally. I'm wrong, I'd like to think he wasn't like those guys.
gravenewworld
gravenewworld is offline
#16
Jan21-08, 06:18 PM
P: 1,389
Quote Quote by Benzoate View Post
Did he plagarigize all of his speeches
Some of his speeches do contain plagiarism. Almost 20% "I Have a Dream" is plagiarized word for word or paraphrased without reference. I would expect a PhD from any university to know the difference between what is and what isn't plagiarism.
russ_watters
russ_watters is offline
#17
Jan21-08, 06:19 PM
Mentor
P: 22,000
Quote Quote by gravenewworld View Post
And Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton don't help Blacks gain equality? Is MLK really that much different than them?
No, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are both only interested in their own power.
gravenewworld
gravenewworld is offline
#18
Jan21-08, 07:03 PM
P: 1,389
Quote Quote by Benzoate View Post
Thomas Jefferson isn't really a saint either , seeing that he cheated on his wife with his slave , and then had a child out of wedlock; but that is independent of what influence his treatise , the declaration of Independence had on many colonists to help form the republic the United States we now know to today. Half of the signers of the constitutions did not always practice what they preach(civil liberties for all the , except slaves, women were excluding from reeking from the benefits the constitution offer), but that does not mean that the constitution wasn't a great document , or the men did not do anything original in taking human rights to the next level , and sweeping feudalism and countries ruled by kings/queens under the rug


Very true. But Jefferson's name didn't include the title REVEREND. Is it hypocritical for someone to preach morals and values as a religious icon while simultaneously cheating on your wife? On a side note there are protestant churches that do view MLK as a saint.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Totally original, nothing stolen or plagiarized. General Discussion 2
Choosing a dissertation topic Academic Guidance 7
8000 word dissertation on a physics topic Quantum Physics 4
Einstein's Wife General Discussion 20
Where did Cain get his wife ? General Discussion 32