Register to reply

Proving an intersection empty set

by rbzima
Tags: intersection, proving
Share this thread:
Jan30-08, 06:10 PM
P: 86
I'm trying to prove

[tex]\bigcap^{\infty}_{n=1}(0,1/n) = [/tex] EMPTY SET.

One thing that I can't seem to bypass is getting past the closed intervals as stated in the Nested Interval Property, which states "For each [tex]n\in[/tex] N, assume we are given a closed interval [tex]I_n = [a_n, b_n] = {x \in[/tex] R [tex]: a_n \leq x \leq b_n}[/tex]. Assume also that each [tex]I_n[/tex] contains [tex]I_n_+_1[/tex].

Therefore, [tex]\bigcap^{\infty}_{n=1}I_n \neq [/tex] EMPTY SET.

Basically, I'm stuck at taking care of the open interval part of this proof. The original for R was proved by showing sup A = x, then x is between the closed interval. Any advice would be great!
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
'Office life' of bacteria may be their weak spot
Lunar explorers will walk at higher speeds than thought
Philips introduces BlueTouch, PulseRelief control for pain relief
Jan31-08, 12:16 AM
P: 1,075
Obviously the intersection is a subset of (0,1), Why? So it will suffice to show that for any x in (0,1) that there exists a set of the form (0, 1/n) to which x does not belong. So basically given x in (0,1) can you figure out how to find n such that x does not belong to (0, 1/n)?

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Intersection of surfaces Calculus 5
Intersection between surfaces Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
A Simple intersection General Math 3
Intersection of subspaces Introductory Physics Homework 4
Intersection of subspaces Introductory Physics Homework 1