Register to reply

Electric Field Produced by an Infinite Sheet.

by smithnh
Tags: electric, field, infinite, produced, sheet
Share this thread:
smithnh
#1
Jan31-08, 03:48 PM
P: 11
I was browsing the internet looking for alternate proofs to why the electric field produced by an infinite sheet was equal to the charge density divided by twice the space permitivity constant. However, in my search I came across a proof that confused me at this link, http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae544.cfm

It found the electric field produced to be eqaul to the charge density divided by only the space permitivity constant. My question is, what happened to the factor of 2. Are they only considering one face of the sheet but even then should that not decrease it by another factor of 2. What is going on here?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Detecting neutrinos, physicists look into the heart of the Sun
Measurement at Big Bang conditions confirms lithium problem
Researchers study gallium to design adjustable electronic components
ZapperZ
#2
Jan31-08, 03:57 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 29,238
This is a common confusion if you do not look carefully at the nature of the charge distribution. On one hand, you have an infinite SHEET of charge, i.e. you have the charge occupying only a sheet, for example, the x-y plane. Here, the E-field is being shared in both spaces z>0 and z<0. So if you do Gauss's Law on here, the resulting E-field has a factor of 1/2.

On the other hand, if you have a conductor occupying the space at z<0, while the surface at z=0 (still the x-y plane) still has the charge, then a similar Gauss's Law application will get you E-field that is twice as large. All the E-field is in the z>0 space.

So just because you have an infinite plane of charge doesn't mean you can ignore the rest of the geometry of the problem.

Zz.
Doc Al
#3
Jan31-08, 04:10 PM
Mentor
Doc Al's Avatar
P: 41,454
Quote Quote by smithnh View Post
It found the electric field produced to be eqaul to the charge density divided by only the space permitivity constant. My question is, what happened to the factor of 2. Are they only considering one face of the sheet but even then should that not decrease it by another factor of 2. What is going on here?
I didn't look at the proof in detail, but if they are talking about an ordinary sheet of charge and they left out that factor of 2, then they made an error somewhere.

(As Zapper points out, there's a common source of confusion when deriving the field from a charged conducting sheet compared to just a sheet of charge. But in that link I don't see them talking about conductors.)

Doc Al
#4
Jan31-08, 05:39 PM
Mentor
Doc Al's Avatar
P: 41,454
Electric Field Produced by an Infinite Sheet.

Quote Quote by Doc Al View Post
I didn't look at the proof in detail, but if they are talking about an ordinary sheet of charge and they left out that factor of 2, then they made an error somewhere.
They messed up the integration:

[tex]\int \frac{a}{(a^2 + x^2)^{3/2}} \;da= \frac{-1}{\sqrt{a^2 + x^2}} \neq \frac{-2}{\sqrt{a^2 + x^2}}[/tex]
smithnh
#5
Feb1-08, 12:33 PM
P: 11
Thanks for the help.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Electric Field for infinite sheet of uniform charge per unit area General Physics 10
Gaussian infinite sheet, electric field Introductory Physics Homework 3
Electric Field Produced by a Ring Introductory Physics Homework 2
Electric field produced by electron Quantum Physics 21
Magnetic Field due to a unifrom thin current sheet of infinite extent Introductory Physics Homework 3