| Thread Closed |
[SOLVED] Hilbert space & orthogonal projection |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb2-08, 09:56 AM | #1 |
|
|
[SOLVED] Hilbert space & orthogonal projection
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Let H be a real Hilbert space, C a closed convex non void subset of H, and a: H x H-->R be a continuous coercive bilinear form (i.e. (i) a is linear in both arguments (ii) There exists M [itex]\geq[/itex] 0 such that |a(x,y)| [itex]\leq[/itex] M||x|| ||y|| (iii) There exists B>0 such that a(x,x) [itex]\geq[/itex] B||x||^2 (a) Show that the exists a continuous linear operator A:H-->H such that a(x,y)=(Ax,y) for all x,y in H. (b) Let z be in H. Show that the exists a constant r>0 such that the operator T:C-->C defined by [itex]T(x)=P_C(rz-rAx+x)[/itex] is a contraction, i.e., ||T(x) - T(y)|| [itex]\leq[/itex] k||x - y|| for some constant k < 1. P_C is the operator "orthogonal projection on C", i.e. is the (unique) element of C such that [itex]d(z,P_C(z)) = d(z,C)[/itex]. 3. The attempt at a solution (a) is done. The operator in question is obtained via Riesz's representation theorem: we choose Ax to be the unique element of H such that a(x,y) = (Ax,y) for all y. Linearity and continuity of A follow from the corresponding properties of a. (b) I already know that the orthogonal projection map is non expensive: for all x,y in H, [tex]||P_C(x) - P_C(y)|| \leq ||x - y||[/tex]. So [tex]||T(x) - T(y)|| \leq ||x-y-rAx+rAy||[/tex] And here I've tried using every inequality I know but with no luck. Clearly, we need something stronger than the triangle inequality, because [tex]||x-y-rAx+rAy||\leq ||x-y|| + r||A(x-y)||\leq (1+r||A||)||x-y||[/tex], which is stricly greater than ||x - y||... |
| Feb2-08, 10:18 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Do you know whether the r used in the definition of T is the same r used in the defintion of a contraction mapping? E.g., I could have written ||T(x) - T(y)|| < k||x - y|| for some constant k < 1.
|
| Feb2-08, 10:39 PM | #3 |
|
|
They are not necessarily the same constant! I apologize for the confusion and I have edited the OP. Thanks for pointing it out.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: [SOLVED] Hilbert space & orthogonal projection
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| [SOLVED] Quick Question: Is this matrix an orthogonal projection? | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| [SOLVED] Little bit of convex analysis on a Hilbert space | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||
| [SOLVED] Hilbert Space | Advanced Physics Homework | 4 | ||
| Find the orthogonal projection | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 0 | ||
| Orthogonal projection | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 8 | ||