Whether or not infidecimal numbers existed

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JonF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the existence of infinitesimal numbers, exploring historical perspectives, mathematical definitions, and the implications of their existence within various number systems. Participants examine the concept from both historical and modern mathematical viewpoints, including its relevance in calculus and physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the existence of infinitesimal numbers and provides a definition, suggesting they are non-zero numbers that remain smaller than any finite number when multiplied.
  • Another participant clarifies that infinitesimals do not exist in the standard Real Number system.
  • A different viewpoint discusses the possibility of creating a new ordered field that includes infinitesimals through abstract algebra, indicating that this approach does not necessarily enhance the power of standard analysis.
  • Historical references are made to Leibnitz, who treated differentials as infinitesimals without proof, and to the later rejection of infinitesimals by mathematicians in the nineteenth century.
  • Abraham Robinson's development of a rigorous theory that includes infinitesimals and transfinite numbers is mentioned, highlighting its application in translating findings back to standard real numbers.
  • One participant notes a cultural divide in academia, where mathematicians may dismiss the term "infinitesimal" as outdated, while it remains a useful concept in physics.
  • Non-Standard Analysis is referenced as a framework that encompasses infinitesimals, with a link to further resources on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and utility of infinitesimal numbers, with no consensus reached regarding their status in mathematics or their relevance in modern contexts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the historical evolution of the concept of infinitesimals, the limitations of standard number systems, and the ongoing debates within mathematical communities regarding their validity and application.

JonF
Messages
621
Reaction score
1
I’m reading this book on math history, and its pretty interesting.

There is this one part where the book goes into two mathematicians (sorry forgot which two) that argued about whether or not infidecimal numbers existed. The book said whether or not they do exist wasn’t proved till much later in history, but it never told if they did or didn’t exist! So do infidecimal numbers exist?

If I remember correctly the definition of a infidecimal number is:

A number that is not Zero.
A number that is so small, that when it is multiplied by any finite number their product will never be a number greater then one.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you mean infinitesimal?

This is not a feature of the Real Number system.
 
What do you mean by "exist"?

As Integral mentions, there are no infinitessimals in any of the standard number systems (such as integers, rationals, reals)

Using abstract algebra, it's a simple exercise to make a new ordered field (a "number system" with +, -, *, /, and <) by adding a number to the real numbers which is decreed to be infinitessimal.

With some tough mathematics, one can arrive at non-standard analysis which can often "enlarge" things to include transfinite and infinitessimal numbers in a practical way. (But in some sense, this is no more powerful than doing things the ordinary way)
 
In the seventeenth century, Leibnitz treated differentials as if they were infinitesimal and represented bonafide numbers. But he offered no proof of their existence.

bio - Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibnitz --->
http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Leibniz.html

By the middle of the nineteenth century the idea of infinitesimals was effectively squelched by mathematicians as unreal and unnecessary.

By the second half of the twentieth century, Abbie Robinson presented a rigorous theory of extended numbers containing regular real numbers, infinitesmals and transfinite numbers too. If x is an infinitesimal number not zero, then 1/x must be a transfinite number (larger than any regular real numbers).

bio - Abraham Robinson --->
http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Robinson.html

So far, Robinson's theory has been used to find out general facts in the extended number system and translate those facts back into ordinary standard real numbers. A complete theory that deals with this extension as a unique and definite system of its own has eluded researchers.
 
Hm, funny. At my university the mathematicians scoff at the physicists for using the term infinitissimal at all, because it is "archaic". True enough, it is out of style in the way calculus is taught these days, but it is a handy conceptual tool in physics (so that if you have a dV you think of it is as an itsibitsi piece of volume...)
 
The Robinson theory is usually called Non-Standard Analysis. Here is a summary of the essentials of the subject, including a list of mathematicians and other specialists interested in it.

Phillip Apps: What is NonStandard Analysis? --->
http://members.tripod.com/PhilipApps/nonstandard.html

Quart
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K