Schroeder's equation: simple observation

  • Thread starter Thread starter phoenixthoth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Observation
phoenixthoth
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
2
i was wondering if you could check this simple observation; there must be something wrong with it.

schroeder's equation is a functional equation. one version is given f, say a self-mapping of R, find bijection g (defined on R) and nontrivial constant r such that g\circ f=rg.

one utra nice result of solving this equation is that the n-th iterate of f can be calculated:
f^{n}\left( x\right) =g^{-1}\left( r^{n}g\left( x\right) \right).

for example, if one is looking to solve the difference equation
a_{n+1}=f\left( a_{n}\right)
then the solution is
a_{n}=f^{n}\left( a_{0}\right), where the nth iterate of f is given above.

clearly, if schroeder's equation is solvable, then the difference equation is too. it isn't as clear to me that if the difference equation is solvable then schroeder's equation is solvable.

turning to conjugacy, let's say for the sake of argument that two self-mappings of R, f and h, are conjugate if there is a bijection g such that
f\circ g=g\circ h.

let Fix(f) denote the set of fixed points for the function f with respect to a given domain (let's stick to R). one can note that if f and h are conjugate, then Fix(f) has the same cardinality as Fix(h).

going back to the main equation, g\circ f=rg, let's assume that there are function g and constant r that satisfies this equation. then compose both sides with g^{-1} to get
g\left( f\left( g^{-1}\left( x\right) \right) \right) =rx. this equation holds for all x in R.

this means that f is conjugate to the linear function h(x)=rx which has one fixed point (we rule out the case when r=1).

since Fix(f) has the same cardinality as Fix(h), they being conjugates, f also has one fixed point.

in short, if schroeder has a solution for the given f then f has one fixed point.

the contrapositive of that is that if f does not have one fixed point then schroeder does not have a solution for the given f.

example: f(x)=2^x.

i'm mainly trying to show that 2^x doesn't admit a solution on all of R. this seems too trivial to be right because only a few functions would admit solutions to schroeder's equation...

WHAT GIVES!?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
##f(x)=2x## admits any linear ##g## as solution with ##r=2##: ##(g\circ f)(x)=g(f(x))=g(2x)=2g(x)##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top