Should I learn Classical Mechanics before Electricity & Magnetism?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on whether students should learn Classical Mechanics (CM) before taking Electricity and Magnetism (E&M). Participants explore the relationship between the two subjects, the prerequisites for understanding E&M, and personal experiences regarding course sequencing.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that CM should be taken before E&M, citing that E&M relies on concepts introduced in CM, such as gravitational potential energy and rotating frames.
  • Others emphasize that E&M is challenging and recommend having a solid foundation from CM to better handle the complexities of E&M.
  • A participant mentions that their school allows students to take CM and E&M simultaneously without issues, suggesting that this approach may work for some.
  • Concerns are raised about the prerequisites for CM courses, particularly regarding knowledge of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and whether certain textbooks assume prior knowledge of advanced topics.
  • Another participant reflects on the importance of foundational skills gained in CM that are applicable to E&M and other physics courses.
  • One participant questions the availability of E&M textbooks that adequately explain foundational concepts for beginners, indicating a potential gap in resources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of CM as a foundation for E&M, but there are differing opinions on whether it is essential to take CM first or if simultaneous enrollment is feasible. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach for all students.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the prerequisites for specific CM courses and the level of mathematical knowledge required, particularly concerning ODEs. There is also ambiguity about the content coverage in different textbooks and courses.

bob1182006
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
I will probably be taking both CM I/II and E&M I/II before I graduate, but I'm wondering is it a bad idea to take E&M before taking CM?

I don't think I can take both at the same time this coming year so I have to pick just one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without a doubt, take CM before E&M.
 
just curious, why do you say definitely CM first?
 
Well, E&M relies on many of the concepts in CM. For example, I think one would need to understand gravitational potential energy before electric potential.
 
Yes, you get introduced to many concepts in CM, whereas in E&M you are expected to have already seen them, and they are just modified for that class.

So for example things like rotating frames, the 1/r potential, etc. Trying to learn all about that AND learn E&M would be tough.
 
I would also say take classical before E&M. E&M is hard for most people, its best to have at least one or two advanced courses before taking it. I am assuming your CM is a course based on the lagrangian and Hamiltonian methods though.
 
The book for CM that is used here is Thornton & Marion, I don't think Lagrangian and Hamiltonian's are taught until a Goldstein level class though.

Does Thornton & Marion require knowledge of ODE's? How about Kleppner?

I haven't taken ODE yet and I guess it's going to hold me back in physics soon.
 
At my school, the [undergraduate, upper division] Classical Mechanics and Electricity & Magnetism are taken simultaneously by students; I did not experience any problems with this when I took the classes.

The Thornton & Marion book does cover Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. Will your course just be skipping this topic, or are you just guessing?

You will be expected to have some knowledge of ordinary differential equations…or rather you’ll need to know how to solve them by the ‘method of assumption’ (i.e. solve ODEs which you already know the solution too, for example simple harmonic oscillators).
 
Do you guys go straight to Marion? I thought that book needs a prereq of basic physics first.
 
  • #10
Cyrus said:
Do you guys go straight to Marion? I thought that book needs a prereq of basic physics first.

In most schools the upper division CM does require the introductory Physics class.

The course description of the CM class states it covers Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics.

Guess I'll have to talk to the professors, the class description says it doesn't require any math above Calc I, but the class might go into ODE type material.
 
  • #11
Last semista,i tok both CM & E&M,wel if i were u, i wud go for CM first as it wil give u maths skils & manipulations that will help u in other physics courses. including E&M.
 
  • #12
Classical Mechanics first, Electromagnetism second. Science is a building : to get to the top, it's way better taking all the steps instead of jumping 3-4 steps each time. Classical Mechanics (the basics) is the first step, and it's before Electromagnetism for the same reasons above : you need many concepts of CM to understand Electromagnetism.

But, that's the way electromagnetism books are made : they often take for granted that you understand these concepts very well. If you find an E&M book such as all these concepts are explained clearly, as if it was the first time you're learning about it, then you can start learning it. But I very much doubt that such a book exist.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K