Thread Closed

Can a point on any 2d surface be uniquely identified by only 2 coordinates?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Mar10-08, 05:20 PM   #1
 

Can a point on any 2d surface be uniquely identified by only 2 coordinates?


This is obviously true for perfectly "flat" surfaces - and, intuitively, it seems to be true for all other sorts of 2d surfaces. Is this a proven result? If so, can we generalize?; can we say a n-elements system of coordinates uniquely identifies a point on any n dimensional object? It carries on to 3 dimensions, I think this is more than obvious, but otherwise?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
mathematics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Mathematicians analyze social divisions using cell phone data
>> Can math models of gaming strategies be used to detect terrorism networks?
>> Mathematician proves there are infinitely many pairs of prime numbers less than 70 million units apart
Mar10-08, 06:01 PM   #2
Vid
 
To say that a surface is "two-dimensional" means that, about each point, there is a coordinate patch on which a two-dimensional coordinate system is defined. For example, the surface of the Earth is (ideally) a two-dimensional sphere, and latitude and longitude provide coordinates on it — except at the International Date Line and the poles, where longitude is undefined. This example illustrates that in general it is not possible to extend any one coordinate patch to the entire surface; surfaces, like manifolds of all dimensions, are usually constructed by patching together multiple coordinate systems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface
Mar10-08, 11:37 PM   #3
 
Hummm, interesting. Thanks, I should research before coming here to ask questions.
Mar16-08, 12:43 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

Can a point on any 2d surface be uniquely identified by only 2 coordinates?


Isn't the fact that any point on the surface can be identified by only 2 coordinates the definition of a 2d surface?
Mar18-08, 09:08 AM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Werg22 View Post
This is obviously true for perfectly "flat" surfaces - and, intuitively, it seems to be true for all other sorts of 2d surfaces. Is this a proven result? If so, can we generalize?; can we say a n-elements system of coordinates uniquely identifies a point on any n dimensional object? It carries on to 3 dimensions, I think this is more than obvious, but otherwise?
What, exactly, is your definition of "2d surface"? Most definitions of "dimension" are precisely the number of coordinates required to specify a point.
Mar18-08, 01:45 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by HallsofIvy View Post
What, exactly, is your definition of "2d surface"? Most definitions of "dimension" are precisely the number of coordinates required to specify a point.
Well from what I understood from the wikipedia site, a surface is 2d if for every point there exists a neighborhood so that all the points in the neighborhood can be described using 2 coordinates in some coordinate system. Interestingly, the coordinate system doesn't have to be universal.
Mar18-08, 01:51 PM   #7
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
the way you phrased the question, the coordinates do not have to be unique, but they do have to specify a unique point. thus your question is equivalent to asking whether for any 2 dimensional surface (supply definition), there is a map from a subset of R^2 onto the surface.

(you said nothing about continuity of coordinates so the answer is trivially yes. now if you want continuity of the parameter map, it is more interesting, but seems likely true, unless you allow really huge, say not paracompact, surfaces.)
Mar18-08, 01:53 PM   #8
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
in fact since there is a continuous map from an interval onto a square, every point of say the square, hence most other surfaces, can be uniquely specified by one coordinate.
Mar20-08, 07:14 AM   #9
 
I'm a little worried about the uniqueness comment, mathwonk.

Aren't space filling curves necessarily not injective?

EDIT: I guess these sets have the same cardinality. But a bijective map therebetween is necessarily discontinuous.
Mar20-08, 04:12 PM   #10
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
we seem to disagree over the meaning of the question.

what he asked was that the coordinates uniquely specify the point, not thaT THE POINT UNIQUELY specify the coordinates..

"Can a point on any 2d surface be uniquely identified by only 2 coordinates?"

that has nothing to do with injectivity of the map from coordinates to points.

that has to do only with well - definedness of the map.


perhaps what he meant waS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT HE ACTUALLY ASKED, I CANNOT TELL THAT.
Mar20-08, 07:31 PM   #11
 
Yes, I see what you mean.

I read the question sort of like the unique representation of vectors as coordinates of a basis.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Can a point on any 2d surface be uniquely identified by only 2 coordinates?
Thread Forum Replies
Double Surface Integrals in Polar Coordinates Calculus & Beyond Homework 8
Coordinates of Point P Precalculus Mathematics Homework 5
Surface Area in Polar Coordinates Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
surface integrals in spherical coordinates Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
3d Point Coordinates Calculus & Beyond Homework 4