| Thread Closed |
Can a point on any 2d surface be uniquely identified by only 2 coordinates? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar10-08, 05:20 PM | #1 |
|
|
Can a point on any 2d surface be uniquely identified by only 2 coordinates?
This is obviously true for perfectly "flat" surfaces - and, intuitively, it seems to be true for all other sorts of 2d surfaces. Is this a proven result? If so, can we generalize?; can we say a n-elements system of coordinates uniquely identifies a point on any n dimensional object? It carries on to 3 dimensions, I think this is more than obvious, but otherwise?
|
| Mar10-08, 06:01 PM | #2 |
|
|
|
| Mar10-08, 11:37 PM | #3 |
|
|
Hummm, interesting. Thanks, I should research before coming here to ask questions.
|
| Mar16-08, 12:43 PM | #4 |
|
|
Can a point on any 2d surface be uniquely identified by only 2 coordinates?
Isn't the fact that any point on the surface can be identified by only 2 coordinates the definition of a 2d surface?
|
| Mar18-08, 09:08 AM | #5 |
|
|
|
| Mar18-08, 01:45 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
| Mar18-08, 01:51 PM | #7 |
|
Recognitions:
|
the way you phrased the question, the coordinates do not have to be unique, but they do have to specify a unique point. thus your question is equivalent to asking whether for any 2 dimensional surface (supply definition), there is a map from a subset of R^2 onto the surface.
(you said nothing about continuity of coordinates so the answer is trivially yes. now if you want continuity of the parameter map, it is more interesting, but seems likely true, unless you allow really huge, say not paracompact, surfaces.) |
| Mar18-08, 01:53 PM | #8 |
|
Recognitions:
|
in fact since there is a continuous map from an interval onto a square, every point of say the square, hence most other surfaces, can be uniquely specified by one coordinate.
|
| Mar20-08, 07:14 AM | #9 |
|
|
I'm a little worried about the uniqueness comment, mathwonk.
Aren't space filling curves necessarily not injective? EDIT: I guess these sets have the same cardinality. But a bijective map therebetween is necessarily discontinuous. |
| Mar20-08, 04:12 PM | #10 |
|
Recognitions:
|
we seem to disagree over the meaning of the question.
what he asked was that the coordinates uniquely specify the point, not thaT THE POINT UNIQUELY specify the coordinates.. "Can a point on any 2d surface be uniquely identified by only 2 coordinates?" that has nothing to do with injectivity of the map from coordinates to points. that has to do only with well - definedness of the map. perhaps what he meant waS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT HE ACTUALLY ASKED, I CANNOT TELL THAT. |
| Mar20-08, 07:31 PM | #11 |
|
|
Yes, I see what you mean.
I read the question sort of like the unique representation of vectors as coordinates of a basis. |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Can a point on any 2d surface be uniquely identified by only 2 coordinates?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Double Surface Integrals in Polar Coordinates | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 8 | ||
| Coordinates of Point P | Precalculus Mathematics Homework | 5 | ||
| Surface Area in Polar Coordinates | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||
| surface integrals in spherical coordinates | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| 3d Point Coordinates | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 4 | ||