Understanding Vector Transformation with <1,-1> Translation - Explained

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kvzrock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformation Vector
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of vector translation, specifically applying the vector <-1,-1> to a function f(x) to derive a new function h(x). The scope includes mathematical reasoning and conceptual clarification regarding the transformation of functions through translation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the meaning of applying the vector <-1,-1> to translate f(x) to h(x).
  • Another participant explains that "translation" generally means to add a vector, suggesting that if f(x) and h(x) are vector-valued functions, then h(x) could be obtained by adding the vector <-1,-1> to f(x).
  • A participant provides the specific function f(x) = x^3 - 3x^2 and states that h(x) should be in the form of ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d, later indicating that the problem is solved.
  • Another participant proposes that the goal is to find a function g(x) that resembles the graph of f(x) but is translated by the vector <-1,-1>, detailing the process of determining g(x) based on the transformation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the translation process and the specific forms of the functions involved. There is no consensus on the final form of h(x) or the exact method of translation, as some participants focus on the general concept while others delve into specific calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of f(x) and h(x) remain unspecified, and the discussion includes different interpretations of what it means to translate a function versus a graph. The mathematical steps to derive h(x) from f(x) are not fully resolved.

kvzrock
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
what does it mean by applying vector <-1,-1> to translate f(x) to h(x)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Translation" in general means to add a vector. Since you haven't told us what "f(x)" and "h(x)" represent I can't be more specific but if they are vector valued functions, then I would suspect you are to add the vector <-1,-1> to f(x).
 
f(x)=x^3-3x^2
h(x) should be in the form of ax^3+bx^2+cx+d

edit: problem solved. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
I suspect that you are intended to find a function whose graph looks exactly line y= f(x) but is translated (one translates geometric things- points and sets of points like graphs- not functions) by <-1,-1>. In particular, that means that, since f(0)= 0, we want g(-1)= -1. First, we want x= -1, in g, to "act like" x=0 in f. That is
g(x)= f(u) for some u so that when x= -1, u= 0: okay the simplest possible thing is u= x+1. If we write g(x)= f(x+1)= (x+1)3- 3(x+1)2, we have g(-1)= f(0) but we are not quite done: g(-1)= f(0)= 0 and we want g(-1)= f(0)-1. Fine: just subtract 1 from what we just got:

g(x)= (x+1)3- 3(x+1)2- 1.

In order to get it in the form "ax3+ b2+ cx+ d", you will need to multiply it out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K