Testimony Before Congress on the U.N. 'Oil for Food' Scandal

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Food
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the U.N. 'Oil for Food' scandal, specifically focusing on the testimony presented regarding the use of oil vouchers by Saddam Hussein and the implications of this program. Participants explore the beneficiaries of the oil vouchers, the authenticity of the claims, and the broader geopolitical context surrounding the scandal.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a list of beneficiaries of Saddam Hussein's oil vouchers, detailing how these vouchers were used to subvert the Oil for Food Program.
  • Another participant expresses frustration with the portrayal of U.S. actions in the context of the war, suggesting that foreign nations were complicit in supporting Saddam Hussein through financial means.
  • Some participants argue that the issue is not with governments but with individuals and entities involved, questioning the relevance of governmental accountability in this context.
  • There is a challenge to the notion that the issue is a non-issue, with one participant questioning the implications of the testimony and the mention of "liberal" restrictions on business.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of the testimony and the implications of the oil vouchers. Some see it as a critical issue, while others dismiss it as a non-issue, indicating a lack of consensus on the importance of the claims made.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various political figures and entities involved in the scandal, but there are unresolved questions regarding the authenticity of the claims and the broader implications of the findings presented in the testimony.

kat
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
http://www.memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=IA17204
I haven't searched for this on the .gov site. When I find it, I'll post that as well unless someone beats me to it. (hint hint)
*snip*
The Testimony
Mr. Chairman: On January 25, 2004 the Iraqi daily Al-Mada published a list of 270 individuals and entities who were beneficiaries of Saddam Hussein's oil vouchers. The Middle East Media Research Institute, or MEMRI, translated the list from Arabic and made it available to non-Arabic readers on January 29.

In my presentation I will address five questions that we have frequently been asked:


First, what are these oil vouchers and how were they used?
Second, who were the beneficiaries?
Third, is the list authentic?
Fourth, what other means did Saddam Hussein use to subvert the Oil for Food Program?
Fifth, could the administrators of the Oil for Food Program have been unaware of the regime's subversion of the Program?
I shall now answer the questions briefly and in that order.

The Nature and Use of the Oil Vouchers
In May 2002, or two years before the oil vouchers achieved their present notoriety, MEMRI issued a special dispatch titled "Iraq Buys and Smuggles its Way out of UN Sanctions." [2] That dispatch catalogued techniques that were being used to subvert the Oil for Food Program, including the use of vouchers to buy friends.

In brief, Saddam Hussein granted oil vouchers to various beneficiaries - individuals as well as public and governmental entities - who could then sell them to oil dealers or agents operating from the Rashid Hotel in Baghdad. The agents would then sell the vouchers to oil companies which, in turn, would submit them to the State Oil Marketing Company or SOMO, to collect the oil. Both the beneficiary and the agent collected quick and handsome profits. A one million barrel voucher surrendered against $0.25 per barrel earned $250,000.



The Beneficiaries
The beneficiaries were from 52 countries and included 19 political parties, and numerous politicians and journalists. Russia led the way among countries, with 46 recipients for a total of about 2.5 billion barrels. Significant individual recipients include the president of Indonesia, the prime minister of Libya, the former prime minister of Yemen, a former French minister of interior, and Mr. Patrick Maugein who, according to French sources, is a financial supporter of French President Chirac.

Finally, the beneficiaries included the sons of the former Egyptian leader Gamal Abdul Nasser, the President of Lebanon Emil Lehoud, and the perennial Syrian minister of defense Mustafa Tlass.
*snip*
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Good job kat. I'm tired of hearing propaganda about the president not getting permission from other countries to defend the United States. The other countries (our peace loving neighbors) and the UN were bought and paid for, even before George W. Bush was president. It's funny to hear these countries accuse us of having a war for oil, when it was oil that bought their support for the butcher of Bagdad in the first place. This is the price of human lives. Despicable.
 
Last edited:
Non-issue. These are individuals and entities, not governments. Funny, though...if the "liberal" restrictions on big business were in place, this sort of thing could be less common.
 
Zero said:
Non-issue. These are individuals and entities, not governments. Funny, though...if the "liberal" restrictions on big business were in place, this sort of thing could be less common.

Huh? did you read the whole testimony? non-issue? and what "liberal" restrictions?
 
Zero said:
Non-issue. These are individuals and entities, not governments.
Unless its Haliburton of course... :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K