FDB for TENNIS


by vysis
Tags: tennis
vysis
vysis is offline
#1
Apr20-08, 05:20 PM
P: 28
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data


for an FDB of an tennis ball hitting the racquet. Is the F(a)=F(n) or is F(a) larger then F(n).



3. The attempt at a solution

I think that F(a) = F(n). According to Newton's second law, they both receive the same force, however since the tennis ball has less mass, it receiver a larger acceleration then the tennis racquet (which is also anchored by the player's arm).

Im pretty sure im right, but it's always good to be sure.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Lemurs match scent of a friend to sound of her voice
Repeated self-healing now possible in composite materials
'Heartbleed' fix may slow Web performance
PhanthomJay
PhanthomJay is online now
#2
Apr20-08, 06:34 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
PhanthomJay's Avatar
P: 5,959
Quote Quote by vysis View Post
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data


for an FDB of an tennis ball hitting the racquet. Is the F(a)=F(n) or is F(a) larger then F(n).
What do you mean by F(a) and F(n)?



3. The attempt at a solution

I think that F(a) = F(n). According to Newton's second law, they both receive the same force, however since the tennis ball has less mass, it receiver a larger acceleration then the tennis racquet (which is also anchored by the player's arm).
This is not Newton's 2nd law.

Im pretty sure im right, but it's always good to be sure.
Draw a FBD of the ball, not the racquet. What forces act on the ball? The problem is not asking for acceleration.
vysis
vysis is offline
#3
Apr20-08, 06:43 PM
P: 28
Quote Quote by PhanthomJay View Post
What do you mean by F(a) and F(n)?
F(a) = applied force
F(n) = Normal force


This is not Newton's 2nd law.
umm, yea sry. I was typing a bit too quickly. Third and Second law.

Draw a FBD of the ball, not the racquet. What forces act on the ball? The problem is not asking for acceleration.
nono, i mean if a tennis racquet was to hit a tennis ball. Would the applied force and normal force be equal or would applied force be larger?

PhanthomJay
PhanthomJay is online now
#4
Apr20-08, 06:57 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
PhanthomJay's Avatar
P: 5,959

FDB for TENNIS


Neglecting the weight of the tennis ball, when the racquet hits the ball, there is only one force acting on the ball...the force of the racquet on the ball, which i guess you are calling an applied force, F(a),which is fine. Now by F(n), I think you mean the force of the ball on the racquet?
vysis
vysis is offline
#5
Apr20-08, 06:58 PM
P: 28
yea, the equal and opposite force excerted on the racquet stated by the 3rd law.
PhanthomJay
PhanthomJay is online now
#6
Apr20-08, 07:21 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
PhanthomJay's Avatar
P: 5,959
Quote Quote by vysis View Post
yea, the equal and opposite force excerted on the racquet stated by the 3rd law.
Well, you just answered your question!
vysis
vysis is offline
#7
Apr20-08, 07:24 PM
P: 28
lol, so to sum it up:

force exerted on ball = force exerted on racquet.
However, ball flies away extremely quickly and racquet doesnt is becaue racquet is heavier and therefore according to Newton's second low, it doesnt accelerate as much (and also since the racquet is anchored to the player's hands)
PhanthomJay
PhanthomJay is online now
#8
Apr20-08, 07:48 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
PhanthomJay's Avatar
P: 5,959
Quote Quote by vysis View Post
lol, so to sum it up:

force exerted on ball = force exerted on racquet.
Correct! (equal but opposite in direction...force exerted on ball by racquet = force exerted on racquet by ball)
However, ball flies away extremely quickly and racquet doesnt is becaue racquet is heavier and therefore according to Newton's second low, it doesnt accelerate as much (and also since the racquet is anchored to the player's hands)
Sort of. The acceleration of the ball will be in the direction of the average impulse force (which you refer to as the applied force), in accordance with Newton 2. The racquets acceleration (deceleration) is a much more complex phenomenon because of the additional varying force acting on it from the player, and the impulsive nature of the event, but it is still Newton 2 at work.
vysis
vysis is offline
#9
Apr29-08, 06:22 AM
P: 28
thank you so much


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Tennis Racquet General Physics 6
A tennis question General Physics 9
Andy Murray's about to take on Nadal in the Aussie Open General Discussion 16
tennis ball example Introductory Physics Homework 2