Brain Teaser #94: Find Machine Specs for Proprietary Production Plant

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter davilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of determining machine specifications for a production plant that manufactures miniature railroad track sections of specific lengths. Participants explore the combinations of lengths that can be produced and the integer lengths that cannot be achieved, considering both theoretical and practical implications. The conversation includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of patterns related to unachievable lengths.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that certain combinations of track lengths, such as 3 cm and 5 cm, yield specific unachievable lengths, while others suggest alternative pairs like 2.5 cm and 4.5 cm.
  • A participant notes that the number of unachievable lengths for any pair (L, L+1) is given by the formula L(L-1)/2, raising questions about the validity of this formula.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of having two even lengths, suggesting that this would lead to an infinite number of unachievable lengths.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about finding patterns among odd and even pairs of lengths and the existence of a stronger form of the formula.
  • One participant mentions the challenge of brute force methods in finding solutions and hints at the need for a combinatorial approach.
  • Another participant suggests that the lengths must be relatively prime to have a finite number of unachievable lengths.
  • There is a claim that solutions exist in the form of pairs like (3,2049) and (5,1025), with some pairs surviving scrutiny while others do not.
  • Participants discuss the correctness of the formula for unachievable lengths and express a desire for proof of its validity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the formulas and methods for determining unachievable lengths. While some participants agree on certain mathematical properties, others challenge the assumptions and seek further clarification, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved on several points.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of track lengths and the unresolved nature of the mathematical proofs regarding the formulas presented. There are also assumptions about the properties of the lengths that have not been fully explored.

davilla
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Brain Thumper #8

The Pacific Proprietary Production Plant has the capacity to manufacture straight sections of miniature railroad track on two machines, each of which produces a specific length of track. For instance, suppose that the company had initially configured the machines to make straight track that is 3 cm and 5 cm long.

A hobbyist who buys this track would be able to use different combinations thereof. For instance, she could combine one 3 cm section and one 5 cm section to fill an 8 cm gap in her modeling project. Three 3 cm sections make 9 cm, two 5 cm sections make 10 cm, and so forth. However, there are some shorter integer lengths that cannot be achieved. In this case it is impossible to get straight track in 1, 2, 4, or 7 cm segments.

As it turns out, given the way that the two machines were configured, there are exactly eight different positive integer lengths that cannot be constructed. Find at least one possibility for the plant's machine specifications. Note, however, that requirements in the way tracks couple prohibit the manufacture of a section that is 2 cm or shorter.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2.5 cm, 4.5 cm; can't make 1,2,3,4,6,8,11,13 cm sections

Now, back to particles in boxes...
 
gnome said:
2.5 cm, 4.5 cm
gnome with the point!

I thought people would get frustrated with this one because there aren't any solutions where the two lengths are integers. It just goes to show that you can't fool everyone.

For the theoretical types, here is another problem. I should warn you that there is only one solution.


Tack-on Teaser:

Same as above except that there are 2048 positive integer lengths of track that cannot be constructed, with the added restriction that only integer lengths of track can be constructed. As before, the specs for each of the two machines must be greater than 2 cm.
 
Last edited:
The number of unachievable lengths for any pair (L, L+1) is L(L-1)/2. Since 2048 is not of this form, the numbers can not be consecutive.

If the pair has 2 evens then there are an infinite number of unachievables - all odd lengths.

Need to look at odd pairs and odd,even pairs to find patterns - assuming they exist. Vague ideas are forming in my head about the convergence of sections of consecutive unachievables. Let's explore.
 
Plz ignore my naivete, if the above is obvious. This is my first time here.
 
Gokul said:
The number of unachievable lengths for any pair (L, L+1) is L(L-1)/2.
Nice formula. How did you come across it?


Gokul said:
If the pair has 2 evens then there are an infinite number of unachievables
True. You could also make that into a stronger statement fairly easily.
 
davilla said:
Nice formula. How did you come across it?

Try it out with any such pair : say 14,15. Here's what you get for the lengths you CAN make :
14,15,
28,29,30,
42,43,44,45,
56,57,58,59,60, etc.

That sould make it obvious !

Eventually, I did come across a stronger form (can't remember it now) but it didn't lead me to a solution.

Will we see that sometime ?
 
Gokul43201 said:
Eventually, I did come across a stronger form ...
Will we see that sometime ?
I don't think anyone's going to crank this one out by brute force.
 
How about a hint ??
 
  • #10
I don't think anyone's going to crank this one out by brute force

Is that a challenge? :biggrin:
 
  • #11
davilla said:
The Pacific Proprietary Production Plant has the capacity to manufacture straight sections of miniature railroad track on two machines, each of which produces a specific length of track. For instance, suppose that the company had initially configured the machines to make straight track that is 3 cm and 5 cm long.

A hobbyist who buys this track would be able to use different combinations thereof. For instance, she could combine one 3 cm section and one 5 cm section to fill an 8 cm gap in her modeling project. Three 3 cm sections make 9 cm, two 5 cm sections make 10 cm, and so forth. However, there are some shorter integer lengths that cannot be achieved. In this case it is impossible to get straight track in 1, 2, 4, or 7 cm segments.

As it turns out, given the way that the two machines were configured, there are exactly eight different positive integer lengths that cannot be constructed. Find at least one possibility for the plant's machine specifications. Note, however, that requirements in the way tracks couple prohibit the manufacture of a section that is 2 cm or shorter.
Never mind, I'll take the bus; that is unless there is another one of these things to deal with for the bus as well. If there is, I will stay at home until the trains are running again.
 
  • #12
Hope you don't say that 2048 is not a solution for any integer pair - cause we all use large chunks of "brute force" to help locate patterns, and that takes time and effort. So far, it does not seem impossible to find solutions of the form 2n, but I haven't been able to find enough to see a pattern. For non-consecutive numbers, there does not appear to be a polynomial pattern. Perhaps a combinatoric approach is what you need...can't find one !

And if you're wondering...I have NOT spent the last month trying to solve this puzzle.
 
  • #13
davilla said:
True. You could also make that into a stronger statement fairly easily.

Did you mean "the numbers need to be relatively prime (or co-prime) to have a finite number of unmakeables" ?
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Gokul43201 said:
For non-consecutive numbers, there does not appear to be a polynomial pattern.
There should be a pattern. The more interesting is the constructive proof of the formula.


Gokul43201 said:
the numbers need to be relatively prime
That's it.
 
  • #15
So you refuse to throw in a hint ?
 
  • #16
WAIT...I'm getting somewhere...don't say anything yet...the clouds appear to be parting...tried neighbors...found pattern...looked at odds...found another pattern...went to n,n+3...found pattern there too...seeing pattern between patterns...could it be...better check...
 
  • #17
Solutions : relatively prime pairs among

[tex]2^x + 1, 2^{12-x} +1 ; x=1,2,3,4,5[/tex]

i.e. (3,2049) (5,1025) (9,513) (17,257) (33,129)

Only last 2 pairs survive : 17,257 and 33,129

PS : With tracks of length m,n (relatively prime) the number of unbuildable lengths is :

[tex]N = (n-1)(m-1)/2[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Gokul43201 said:
With tracks of length m,n (relatively prime) the number of unbuildable lengths is:

[tex]N = (n-1)(m-1)/2[/tex]

The formula is correct. I can't believe that, in coming up with the problem, I subtracted one from the factors of 2^blah instead of adding one. You may have found two solutions instead of the lone one I had expected, but thankfully it turns out there is some solution after all.
 
  • #19
With tracks of length m,n (relatively prime) the number of unbuildable lengths is :

[tex]N = (n-1)(m-1)/2[/tex]

Do you have a proof for why this is true ? I'd love to see it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
25K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
37K