Thread Closed

Scalar Function on a Surface

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
May1-08, 02:34 PM   #1
 

Scalar Function on a Surface


Hi guys and gals

This is a conceptual question. Lets say I have a scalar function, [tex]f(x,y,z)[/tex] defined throughout [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex]. Further I have some bounded surface, S embedded in [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex].

How would I find the function f, defined on the surface S?

Would it be the inner product of f and S, [tex]<f|S>[/tex] or a functional composition like [tex]f \circ S[/tex]?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
May1-08, 04:26 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
f is a scalar, so inner product of S and f makes no sense. I don't know what you have in mind by functional composition
May1-08, 06:09 PM   #3
 
you mean you want parameterize f by s? as in restrict f to s? like for the purposes of a surface integral?
May2-08, 02:58 AM   #4
 

Scalar Function on a Surface


Quote by mathman View Post
f is a scalar, so inner product of S and f makes no sense.
From what I understand the inner product <f|g> is
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)g^{*}(t)dt[/tex].

The mistake I made was to think that they are scalar functions aswell even though f and g are complex functions. Sorry about that. The closest thing I've come to inner products for functions was the orthonormality of the basis functions for Fourier series.

Quote by ice109
you mean you want parameterize f by s? as in restrict f to s? like for the purposes of a surface integral?
This is exactly what I had in mind. Sorry I should have been more explicit where I was going with it.

I understand what we are doing if we have a vector field [tex]\textbf{F}[/tex] and want to find out how it permeates (eg. flux through a surface) a surface S but dotting it with the unit normal of the surface and integrating on the surface. This is actually what made me think of the inner product:
[tex]\iint\textbf{F}\cdot\textbf{n}\,\mathrm{dS}[/tex]

Thanks for the replies
May2-08, 06:24 AM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
That is the "inner product" only if you are thinking of f and g as vectors in L2.

You have a function, f(x,y,z), and are given a surface S. You don't say how you are "given" the surface but since it is two dimensional, it is always possible to parameterize it with two variables: on S, x= x(u,v), y= y(u,v), z= z(u,v). Replace x, y, and z in f with those: f(x(u,v),y(u,v),z(u,v).

For example, suppose you have the parabolic surface z= x2+ 2y2 and some function f(x,y,z). Then you can take x and y themselves as parameters and, restricted to that surface, your function is f(x,y,x2+ 2y2).
May2-08, 06:39 AM   #6
 
Thanks HallsofIvy that cleared things up :)
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Scalar Function on a Surface
Thread Forum Replies
"Consider a surface S on which a scalar field f is defined" General Math 5
Surface with Ricci scalar equal to two Differential Geometry 7
Surface with Ricci scalar equal to two Advanced Physics Homework 1
surface cut function in matlab? Math & Science Software 4
From the scalar of curvature (Newman-Penrose formalism) to the Ricci scalar Special & General Relativity 8