How Do You Calculate the Frequency of a Tuning Fork Using a Resonance Tube?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the frequency of a tuning fork using a resonance tube, the method involves adjusting the length of an air column until it matches the resonant frequency, with the smallest length L being 8.00 cm. The speed of sound in air is given as 330 m/s, which is crucial for frequency calculations. The formula V = f * λ is relevant, where V is the speed of sound, f is the frequency, and λ is the wavelength related to L. There is confusion regarding the application of the formula V/4L for determining the next two harmonics, indicating a need for clarity on harmonic relationships. Accurate calculations require careful attention to units and the correct application of the resonance principles.
lettertwelve
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The frequency of a tuning fork can be found by the method shown in Figure 13-24. A long tube open at both ends is submerged in a beaker of water, and the vibrating tuning fork is placed near the top of the tube. The length of the air column, L, is adjusted by moving the tube vertically. The sound waves generated by the fork are reinforced when the length of the air column corresponds to one of the resonant frequencies of the tube. The smallest value for L for which a peak occurs in sound intensity is 8.00 cm. (Use 330 m/s as the speed of sound in air.)

13-24.gif


(a) What is the frequency of the tuning fork?
______Hz
(b) What is the value of L for the next two harmonics?
______m
______m

Homework Equations



V/4L ?

The Attempt at a Solution



i tried the V/4L for part b, but nothing works.
i don't know where to even start
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi lettertwelve,

What numbers did you use in your attempts for part b? Did you find the frequencies of the next two harmonics?
 
  • Like
Likes arimariewil22
Not only what numbers did you use, but did you include units in the calculation?

What did you get when you calculated V/4L, and how do you know (or why do you think) it is wrong?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top