|Jun11-08, 04:40 PM||#1|
when looking at a cartesian graph
should every whole number that curve x crosses be taken into consideration when
constructing a polar graph? For example, when y=1 is crossed, should the radius be drawn
on the polar graph if the x value is not an exact, uh, pi number (for example instead
of .77 which is pi/4 the x value that curve x crosses 1 is at .88 or something like that)
To see what I mean, graph 3cosx and look where y=2 is crossed (at x=.84). Should I ignore this point?
|Jun12-08, 08:13 AM||#2|
?? I have no idea what you are talking about. To perfectly graph a function, you have to take every number into account, not just whole numbers! To approximately graph a function, you need to decide how accurate you want to be as opposed to how much work you want to do. The only reason for using "pi numbers" (by which I take it you mean simple fractions of pi) is that they are easy- the same reason you might use whole numbers for Cartesian graphs. There is no "mathematical" rule.
|Similar Threads for: when looking at a cartesian graph|
|Cartesian product of cartesian products||Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics||4|
|Cartesian Equation Graph help||Calculus & Beyond Homework||1|
|The Cartesian Product||Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics||9|
|Real life situation to a sin graph on position by time graph||Differential Equations||6|
|Graph Theory -- How do I construct this graph?||Calculus & Beyond Homework||2|