Motion of Charges: Surface Charge Density

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Motion
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of surface charge density on a moving plate within a magnetic field. Participants are exploring the implications of charge movement relative to the motion of the plate and the resulting magnetic forces acting on it.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the nature of surface charge density when the plate is moving as a whole, while the charges themselves seem stationary. There is a comparison made to a person moving within a moving train to illustrate the concept of relative motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the equivalence of scenarios involving moving charges and the implications of Earth's rotation on charge motion. Some guidance is offered regarding the introduction of a magnetic field and its relation to the plate's motion.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions regarding charge movement in finite systems and the effects of external magnetic fields. The discussion does not reach a consensus but highlights various interpretations of the problem.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let's take a look at an example: A surface charge s resides on a plate with area A. The plate is moving with a velocity v in a magnetic field B, so then the magnetic force on the plate will be:

[tex] {\bf{F}} = \int {{\bf{K}} \times {\bf{B}}} \,d{\rm{a}}[/tex]

where K is the surface charge density of the top plate.

How does it make sense to talk about a surface charge density in this case, when the charges themselves are not moving, but the plate is moving as a whole? Does this mean that the two scenarios equivalent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:
How does it make sense to talk about a surface charge density in this case, when the charges themselves are not moving, but the plate is moving as a whole? Does this mean that the two scenarios equivalent?
Oh but the charges are moving.
 
How can they be moving when the plane is finite and not part of a circuit?
 
Niles said:
How can they be moving when the plane is finite and not part of a circuit?
Consider yourself standing inside a railway carriage that is traveling uniformally through a station. Are you moving?
 
Yes, I am.

But if that is the case, then wouldn't the charges constantly be in motion because of Earth's rotation and hence feel a magnetic force always in a magnetic field?
 
Niles said:
But if that is the case, then wouldn't the charges constantly be in motion because of Earth's rotation and hence feel a magnetic force always in a magnetic field?
That depends. Suppose you introduce a magnet field by using a simple magnet, you place the magnet on a workbench and then place the plate on the bench next to the magnet. The plate is now in the magnetic field created by the magnet, but is the plate moving relative to the magnetic field?
 
Ahh, I see.. Very good, very good. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K