How do electromagnetic waves propagate ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the propagation of electromagnetic (EM) waves, exploring the mechanisms behind their self-sustaining nature, the challenges of replicating this in laboratory settings, and the implications of resistance and power dissipation in circuits. Participants examine theoretical and experimental aspects, questioning established explanations and proposing alternative views.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that EM waves propagate through the self-sustaining oscillation of electric and magnetic fields, while others challenge the completeness of this explanation.
  • One participant notes that oscillations in a capacitance-inductance circuit are not self-sustaining due to resistance, which halts the oscillations once the motivating force is removed.
  • Another participant argues that the decay time of oscillations should be considered, suggesting that the halt is not immediate.
  • A claim is made that shining a torch into the sky could be viewed as a form of perpetual motion, but this is countered by the assertion that light will interact with particles in the atmosphere, preventing it from propagating indefinitely.
  • Concerns are raised about the definition of a "perpetual motion machine," with one participant arguing that a light beam does not constitute a machine and drawing analogies to atomic structures.
  • Discussion includes the limitations of laser beams, with one participant noting that diffraction prevents a laser from maintaining focus over long distances.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that circuits do not radiate waves, stating that even small circuits can produce detectable signals, albeit with minimal power radiated.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of virtual photons and questions the nature of electric and magnetic fields in relation to experimental observations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of EM wave propagation, the implications of resistance in circuits, and the nature of perpetual motion. There is no consensus on the explanations provided, and multiple competing perspectives remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various experimental setups and theoretical concepts, but there are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions made about electric and magnetic fields, the nature of power dissipation, and the conditions under which certain phenomena occur.

McQueen
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
How do electromagnetic waves propagate ? The explanation that is normally put forward to this question is that EM propagates through the self sustaining or oscillation of the electric and magnetic fields , which both support each other. As the electric field recedes the magnetic field increases and vice versa , and this can go on almost indefinitely. Yet if we try to duplicate this process in a laboratory by using a capacitance inductance circuit , we find that the oscillations are very far from being self sustaining , coming to an immediate halt once the motivating force has been removed. Surely , given our more or less exact knowledge of how the process supposedly takes place , it should be possible to set up some kind of perpetual motion machine . Always taking into account , of course that Maxwell’s version of the propagation of electromagnetic waves are based in fact .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
McQueen said:
Yet if we try to duplicate this process in a laboratory by using a capacitance inductance circuit , we find that the oscillations are very far from being self sustaining , coming to an immediate halt once the motivating force has been removed.

This is bcause you have resistance in your circuit.

Surely , given our more or less exact knowledge of how the process supposedly takes place ,

Hmm, it seems to me that you have a far from perfect knowledge of this.

it should be possible to set up some kind of perpetual motion machine . Always taking into account , of course that Maxwell’s version of the propagation of electromagnetic waves are based in fact .

I can set up this 'perpetual motion machine' for you. I will shine a torch into the sky and the light from that will propagate forever until it interacts with something.

Matt
 
McQueen said:
...we find that the oscillations are very far from being self sustaining , coming to an immediate halt once the motivating force has been removed.
Not immediate; after ringing the circuit there is a decay time involved.
 
I can set up this 'perpetual motion machine' for you. I will shine a torch into the sky and the light from that will propagate forever until it interacts with something.

a light beam is not a machine - if moving particles constituted a machine
then the atoms in a potato could be called a perpetual motion machine
in which case I could point to a potato and proclaim: "here is a perpetual motion machine"

as for the beam from a torch, it won't take long to interact,
particles in the atmosphere alone would scatter the light from the torch very quickly, so it would never make it into space

a powerful searchlight produces a highly focused beam of light - sometimes visible from space, and yet the most powerful searchlight cannot make a spotlight on the moon

however an extremely high powered laser can make a laser dot on the moon
 
energia said:
however an extremely high powered laser can make a laser dot on the moon
What do you mean by "dot"? Even a laser does not stay focused for long distances. Diffraction makes it impossible. For example, in the Apollo laser ranging experiments, the laser "spot" was 4 miles wide.
 
McQueen said:
Yet if we try to duplicate this process in a laboratory by using a capacitance inductance circuit , we find that the oscillations are very far from being self sustaining , coming to an immediate halt once the motivating force has been removed.
Not true at all. Any such circuit radiates waves. Set up a 1MHz oscillator with a capacitor and an inductor and you will have no trouble at all picking up the signal with an AM radio. The amount of power radiated away is very small indeed, but that is because your radiator, being a few cm across is tiny compared with the 1MHz wavelength of 300 metres. To find out how to radiate the power efficiently, look up stuff on antennas.
 
Krab
To find out how to radiate the power efficiently, look up stuff on antennas.
I have , naturally , already done that. The point I am trying to make is . First , there is no , electric field and second there is no magnetic field. What kind of input do we get from all these experiments , some of them highly sophisticated , which speak of magnetic fields ? The field around a magnet is identical in every way to the field around a wire carrying a current. Further to get back to the point you had raised , even given that there is no resistance , there should be some dissipation of power . How then can light travel billions of kilometres.This is the point I was trying to make . Given superconductors , and remember those are very special conditions , it is always a possibility , but a very far fetched possibility. The existence of virtual photons and a virtual photon sea which permeates the whole Universe . Is a reality.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
22K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K