How does the movement of water affect resistance?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the movement of water and electrical resistance in a setup involving metallic wires submerged in a flowing liquid. The original poster is exploring how the speed and direction of water flow affect resistance, drawing parallels to magnetoresistance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss experimental observations regarding resistance changes with water flow and question the implications of ion movement and electrode positioning. There are attempts to relate findings to magnetoresistance and to understand the effects of water purity on resistance measurements.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and questioning previous conclusions. Some suggest that the geometry of the setup may play a significant role in resistance, while others express uncertainty about the effects of motion on resistance. Guidance on potential experiments and theoretical models has been offered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as the challenge of maintaining pure water and the complexity of measuring resistance accurately in dynamic conditions. There is also mention of competition rules allowing for external advice, which influences the collaborative nature of the discussion.

ponjavic
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
Im a high-school student from Sweden currently competing in a worldwide physicstournament. Our task is to work with a problem both with theory and experiments. A professor here in Sweden told me that our problem is very similar to magnetoresistance.

The question is as follows:

Flow
Using a dc source, investigate how the resistance between two metallic wires dipped into a flowing liquid depends upon the speed and direction of the flow

The assignment consists of both building a theory revolving the connection between velocity, resistance and direction and also to prove these theories with experiments.

We have done some experiments and can conclude the following.

For water that runs in a U-shaped pipe solely accelerated by gravity:
If the electricity is led across the pipe the resistance grows with the velocity.
If the electricity is led alongsides the pipe the resistance grows or sinks with the velocity depending on the direction of the nodes in other words where we have - and +.

This is obviously unpure water as pure water would give no difference when switching - + and + - in the second scenario.

Certainly it seems as though scenario number one is the most normal and this on applies to magnetoresistance. We have an electric current and we apply a peripendicular force to it to change the resistance.

What I can conclude is that electricity in water is created by positive ions accepting electrons and negative ions releasing them e.g hydroxide and oxonium.
What I can't understand is why movement would negate some of these events. Why would a force change the resistance? Does it make the ions spend more energy? Do some ions not make it as far as to the electrode or what is it that happens?

I have no posibility (right now) to check wether pure water would change resistance when put through scenario one but I believe that it will. I also believe that it wouldn't change in scenario 2 because the number of + and - ions would be the same.

I was wondering if you could give us ideas on how to make formulas from magnetoresistance work for our case and also on how to conduct the experiments.

We started with the U-pipe by changing angles but we had big problems with that. We decided to have the pipe horizontally on the floor instead and by attaching the electrodes to a toy train or similar let them run through the water.

Any suggestions, theories or ideas on where we could find help, may you not be able, would be highly appreciated.

//Aleks Ponjavic
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ponjavic said:
For water that runs in a U-shaped pipe solely accelerated by gravity:
If the electricity is led across the pipe the resistance grows with the velocity.
If the electricity is led alongsides the pipe the resistance grows or sinks with the velocity depending on the direction of the nodes in other words where we have - and +.

This is obviously unpure water as pure water would give no difference when switching - + and + - in the second scenario.
How did you come to your last conclusion? As the OH- and H+ ions are of completely different size and nature, a different propagation speed is not some sort of miracle. You would get the same results with pure water if you ask me.
 
I guess i subconsiously tried to create what my teachers stated but when I rethink it you're absolutely right.
A thing that bothers me now is that when i fill a box with water and move the electrodes around i always have the same resistance. It seems as though the other experiment gave results simply because there was a constant change of flow and depth.
Can it be that motion have no effect at all? Seems unlikely since this is a competition.
 
Last edited:
ponjavic said:
I guess i subcontiously tried to what my teachers stated but when I rethink it you're absolutely right.
A thing that bothers me is now when i fill a box with water and move the electrodes around i always have the same resistance. It seems as though the other experiment gave results simply because there was a constant change of flow and depth.
Can it be that motion have no effect at all? Seems unlikely since this is a competition.
If you move the electrodes around, the ions will not have to move "upstream" or "downstream" or anything except in a small area around the electrodes where the water is moved, so the situation is not equivalent to holding the electrodes stationary and moving the water.
 
Mr simon is there anyway i could chat with you as the presentation is coming soon and the forum way will take too long? You seem to know exactly what i need.
BTW we are allowed to ask other people for advice as that's part of the competition.
 
Check your PMs, I'll send one.
 
Btw, if anyone else has an idea, please post it. I'm not having my courseat hand and it has been years since I practised physical chemistry.
 
If I recall correctly the resistance of a large fluid bath is more dependent on the GEOMETRY (ie Spherical, pointed, etc) of the probes then their separation.

In tap water there are many current carriers not just H and OH, the conductivity of water is due, in a large part, to the other ions present.

What do you mean by "pure" water? De Ionized water will have resistance in the range of 10 Meg Ohms. This of course is very hard to maintain.

I Would suggest adding a known conductor (NaCl ?) measuring static resistance and then a range of flow rates (assuming that you do have a reasonable accurate flow meter?)
 
Btw, I've proposed a simple model - most likely too simple :rolleyes: - to try to explain some findings. It is on my website at http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~skdmeule/WaterResistance.doc . Please take a look at it, point out mistakes, faulty assumptions...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
When calculating the velocity i use a piece of paper putting it in the water in the inclined pipe. I have a starting point and a finish point. By dividing D/T ill geet the average speed. I'm not sure how accurate this is at it should not be a constant velocity. Maybe sqrt(2)*D/T should be used instead?
 
  • #11
Another thing:
as the water runs through the pipe at higher velocities the area between the electrodes will decrease, the height of the water will decrease. Will the amount of ions passing through still be the same? Will the higher speed of the water compensate this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K