## How many triangles?

So, being inundated with the "How many triangles?" questions on Facebook, I noticed this one which is actually more difficult than I expect the question author intended:

Assuming you have 21 dots evenly distributed in an equilateral triangular pattern (like bowling pins), how many distinct triangles can be formed by connecting the dots?

Of course, I'll bet they expect people to interpret "equilateral triangles" rather than simply "triangles", but it does make for a more interesting challenge.

And on that note, how many are possible with 3 dots, 6 dots, 10 dots, and 15 dots? Is there a nice formula for progression as the number of available dots increases?

DaveE
 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> Leading 3-D printer firms to merge in $403M deal (Update)>> LA to give every student an iPad;$30M order>> CIA faulted for choosing Amazon over IBM on cloud contract
 When the "starting triangle's base" has N dots, then the number of equilateral triangles is Spoiler (N-1)*N*(N+1)*(N+2)/24 which means Spoiler 70 equilateral triangles in the figure.

Recognitions:
Gold Member
Staff Emeritus
 Quote by davee123 Of course, I'll bet they expect people to interpret "equilateral triangles" rather than simply "triangles", but it does make for a more interesting challenge.
Which way do you want us to interpret it: only equilaterals or all triangles?

## How many triangles?

I suppose both questions are interesting-- answer what you will, I guess! But I couldn't think of a formula that expressed the number of "triangles" given N dots. I honestly never even tried to answer the equilateral triangle question, since it seemed more trivial. But there are some interesting caveats to it.

DaveE
 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus I get a different answer from rogerio for equilateral triangles. Maybe I am overlooking some triangles somewhere... For N even: Spoiler n(2n^2-n-2)/8 = 48 triangles for n=6 base dots For N odd: Spoiler (n-1)(n+1)(2n-1)/8 triangles.

 Quote by Gokul43201 I get a different answer from rogerio for equilateral triangles. Maybe I am overlooking some triangles somewhere...
I got the same answer as Rogerio for the equilateral triangles-- there are some non-standard orientations, don't forget!

DaveE

Recognitions:
Gold Member
Staff Emeritus
 Quote by davee123 I got the same answer as Rogerio for the equilateral triangles-- there are some non-standard orientations, don't forget! DaveE
Oops, yes! I was missing those.
 I'm assuming your formulae simply count all possible 3-dot combinations and assumes a triangle joins them. Is that correct? Do these formula eliminate "degenerate shapes"? i.e. three dots in a straight line does not a triangle make, so some combos of 3 dots are not valid. Oh, I see you guys are pursing only equilateral triangles so far, so my point is moot.

 Quote by DaveC426913 I see you guys are pursing only equilateral triangles so far, so my point is moot.
Well, moot in terms of equilateral triangles, but not all triangles, which is what I was more interested in. Figuring out all the sets of 3 points is pretty simple, but figuring out which sets of 3 are in straight lines was tougher-- at least in terms of trying to get a formula.

DaveE

 Quote by davee123 Well, moot in terms of equilateral triangles, but not all triangles, which is what I was more interested in. Figuring out all the sets of 3 points is pretty simple, but figuring out which sets of 3 are in straight lines was tougher-- at least in terms of trying to get a formula. DaveE
I suppose it would be easier to write an algorithm (where you have access to loops and decision trees) than a formula. I wonder if all algorithms are transposable into formulae...

 Quote by davee123 Figuring out all the sets of 3 points is pretty simple, but figuring out which sets of 3 are in straight lines was tougher-- at least in terms of trying to get a formula.
Agreed.

I got 114 degenerated triangles (3 points in line).
So the number of general triangles in the figure is
21*20*19/6 - 114 = 1216.

But it was a very ugly way...
 Yep, that matches what I got, although I just did 21 choose 3 - 114. Same difference, though. DaveE
 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus General formula for the 114? Now that should be fun!

 Similar discussions for: How many triangles? Thread Forum Replies General Math 3 Precalculus Mathematics Homework 2 General Math 0 Introductory Physics Homework 17 Introductory Physics Homework 6