image
Physics Forums Logo
image
image
* Register * Upgrade Blogs Library Staff Rules Mark Forums Read
image
image   image
image

Go Back   Physics Forums > Mathematics > Number Theory


Reply

image Are primes just "random"? Share It Thread Tools Search this Thread image
Old Mar2-09, 09:13 AM                  #1
Gerenuk

Gerenuk is Offline:
Posts: 443
Are primes just "random"?

What are the indications that primes follow some patterns and that maybe some day someone will find algorithmically simple rules for prime properties?

I was thinking that maybe one merely can prove that prime numbers exist, but they represent some highly complex something that never will reveal simple pattern.

Similarly to the Mandelbrot set, which is just a complex pattern - not completely random, but probably does not involve much more features beyond it's definition?
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar2-09, 10:15 AM                  #2
CRGreathouse

CRGreathouse is Offline:
Posts: 2,939
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Helper
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Originally Posted by Gerenuk View Post
What are the indications that primes follow some patterns and that maybe some day someone will find algorithmically simple rules for prime properties?
What would you consider algorithmically simple?

We have fast methods for locating primes (thanks to Atkin/Bernstein) that take less time (asymptotically) to enumerate primes on an interval than to enumerate the interval itself.

The number of primes on an interval can be computed in near-sqrt time (Lagarias and Odlyzko 1987).

Under the Riemann hypothesis, the number of primes can be approximated in polylogarithmic time with only sqrt * log error.

The status (prime/nonprime) of an isolated number can be determined in polynomial time (AKS).

The status of an isolated number can be determined with high probability in quadratic time (Rabin, Grantham).

A simple expression is equivalent to the primality of a number greater than four (Wilson).

A polynomial exists which has solutions in positive integers exactly when a number k (k + 2 in most versions) is prime (Jones, Sato, Wada, & Wiens 1976).
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar2-09, 01:58 PM                  #3
Gerenuk

Gerenuk is Offline:
Posts: 443
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Originally Posted by CRGreathouse View Post
What would you consider algorithmically simple?
I'm not sure about my question, but your examples sound convincing enough :)

Hmm, then what would you call the most outstanding prime problems nowadays?

Could you give me the references for:
Originally Posted by CRGreathouse View Post
The status of an isolated number can be determined with high probability in quadratic time (Rabin, Grantham).
Are primes useful for anything apart from cryptography?
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar2-09, 03:10 PM                  #4
yyat

yyat is Offline:
Posts: 325
Re: Are primes just "random"?

You may also want to read this discussion on structure and randomness of the prime numbers.
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar2-09, 05:30 PM       Last edited by Dadface; Mar2-09 at 05:43 PM..            #5
Dadface
 
Dadface's Avatar

Dadface is Offline:
Posts: 855
Recognitions:
PF Contributor PF Contributor
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Gerenuk I think that proving the Riemann hypothesis stands high on the list of unsolved problems.I tried it this morning over breakfast but I got nowhere.Then I realised that I dont know what the hypothesis is.
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar2-09, 05:52 PM                  #6
csprof2000

csprof2000 is Offline:
Posts: 290
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Is it true that between any prime number p and p*p, there exists a prime number q?
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar2-09, 07:08 PM       Last edited by ramsey2879; Mar2-09 at 07:44 PM..            #7
ramsey2879

ramsey2879 is Offline:
Posts: 546
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Originally Posted by CRGreathouse View Post
What would you consider algorithmically simple?

We have fast methods for locating primes (thanks to Atkin/Bernstein) that take less time (asymptotically) to enumerate primes on an interval than to enumerate the interval itself.

The number of primes on an interval can be computed in near-sqrt time (Lagarias and Odlyzko 1987).

Under the Riemann hypothesis, the number of primes can be approximated in polylogarithmic time with only sqrt * log error.

The status (prime/nonprime) of an isolated number can be determined in polynomial time (AKS).

The status of an isolated number can be determined with high probability in quadratic time (Rabin, Grantham).

A simple expression is equivalent to the primality of a number greater than four (Wilson).

A polynomial exists which has solutions in positive integers exactly when a number k (k + 2 in most versions) is prime (Jones, Sato, Wada, & Wiens 1976).
How does This Test Compare with the ones you noted


If N = -1 mod 4 then N is prime if and only if LaTeX Code: C(-F_{A},F_{D}) = -1 \\mod N

If N = 1 mod 4 then N is prime if and only if LaTeX Code: C(F_{D},F_{A}) = 1  \\mod N

Here LaTeX Code: F_{A} = F_{(N-3)/2} and LaTeX Code: F_{D} = F_{(N+3)/2 are the Fibonacci numbers and C(a,b) = a^2 +ab - b^2.
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar2-09, 07:17 PM                  #8
Hurkyl

PF Mentor
 
Hurkyl's Avatar

Hurkyl is Offline:
Posts: 13,011
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Originally Posted by csprof2000 View Post
Is it true that between any prime number p and p*p, there exists a prime number q?
You can do much better than that; Bertrand's postulate implies there's one between p and 2p. This wiki page references some further results on this topic.
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar2-09, 07:42 PM                  #9
CRGreathouse

CRGreathouse is Offline:
Posts: 2,939
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Helper
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Originally Posted by Gerenuk View Post
Hmm, then what would you call the most outstanding prime problems nowadays?
The Riemann hypothesis. Nothing else is even close.

Originally Posted by Gerenuk View Post
Could you give me the references for:
Michael O. Rabin, "Probabilistic algorithm for testing primality", Journal of Number Theory 12:1 (1980), pp. 128-138.

Jon Grantham, "Frobenius pseudoprimes", Mathematics of Computation, 70:234 (2001), pp. 873-891.

Originally Posted by Gerenuk View Post
Are primes useful for anything apart from cryptography?
Almost everything in number theory relates to the primes in some way. They're important for understanding the structure of numbers and for fast numerical algorithms.
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar2-09, 07:43 PM                  #10
CRGreathouse

CRGreathouse is Offline:
Posts: 2,939
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Helper
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Originally Posted by ramsey2879 View Post
How does This Test Compare with the ones you noted


If N = -1 mod 4 then N is prime if and only if LaTeX Code: C(-F_{A},F_{D}) = 1 \\mod N

If N = 1 mod 4 then N is prime if and only if LaTeX Code: C(F_{D},F_{A}) = -1  \\mod N

Here LaTeX Code: F_{A} = F_{(N-3)/2} and LaTeX Code: F_{D} = F_{(N+3)/2 are the Fibonacci numbers and C(a,b) = a^2 +ab - b^2.
It's weaker than Grantham's test.
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar3-09, 04:22 AM                  #11
Gerenuk

Gerenuk is Offline:
Posts: 443
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Originally Posted by CRGreathouse View Post
The Riemann hypothesis. Nothing else is even close.
Which important results follow from the Riemann hypothesis? Some results the final converge into real world applications?
What would be the second most important problem about primes? :)

Originally Posted by CRGreathouse View Post
Almost everything in number theory relates to the primes in some way. They're important for understanding the structure of numbers and for fast numerical algorithms.
So numerical algorithms can be improved with primes. Which for example? I mean something that in the end has some "real world" application. Not something which is a dead end in some fictional world of thoughts. I mean I'm also interested a bit in number theory, but I honestly cannot explain to some people why it's useful (apart from cryptography).
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar3-09, 04:47 AM                  #12
Dadface
 
Dadface's Avatar

Dadface is Offline:
Posts: 855
Recognitions:
PF Contributor PF Contributor
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Gerenuk try googling the following:
1.millenium prize problems
2.the music of the primes
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar3-09, 05:29 AM                  #13
Gerenuk

Gerenuk is Offline:
Posts: 443
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Originally Posted by Dadface View Post
Gerenuk try googling the following:
1.millenium prize problems
2.the music of the primes
Thx.
1. I couldn't find any other prime related problems
2. I dig into that a bit more. Unfortunately the reference to nature is a bit slim.

I looked up Riemann hypothesis. Didn't we find zeros of expressions at school? Can't remember the equation though. For the problem I guess you substitute z->z+1/2 and show that all zeros are imaginary. Unfortunately I don't have the time to continue here
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar3-09, 07:52 AM                  #14
CRGreathouse

CRGreathouse is Offline:
Posts: 2,939
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Helper
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Originally Posted by Gerenuk View Post
1. I couldn't find any other prime related problems
The RH is the only prime-related question among the Millennium Problems. Here are some other prime-related problems:

Are there infinitely many twin primes? Do the number of prime values taken by a polynomial follow the expected (Hardy-Littlewood) distribution? Is there always a prime between positive squares? The Goldbach conjectures: is every even number greater than two the sum of three primes? Is evey odd number greater than five the sum of three primes? De Polignac's conjecture: is every positive even number the difference between consecutive primes infinitely often? Are there finitely many Fermat primes? Cramer's conjecture: is the gap between consecutive primes always less than (some multiple of) the square of the logarithm of the smaller prime?
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar3-09, 08:57 AM                  #15
Gerenuk

Gerenuk is Offline:
Posts: 443
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Originally Posted by CRGreathouse View Post
Are there infinitely many twin primes? Do the number of prime values taken by a polynomial follow the expected (Hardy-Littlewood) distribution? Is there always a prime between positive squares? The Goldbach conjectures: is every even number greater than two the sum of three primes? Is evey odd number greater than five the sum of three primes? De Polignac's conjecture: is every positive even number the difference between consecutive primes infinitely often? Are there finitely many Fermat primes? Cramer's conjecture: is the gap between consecutive primes always less than (some multiple of) the square of the logarithm of the smaller prime?
Thanks for the list!
The problem you mentioned below to two categories:
- density/number of primes
- sums or difference of primes
Are there significant other theorems (apart from say existence and divisibility theorems like little Fermat's)?
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar3-09, 03:01 PM                  #16
CRGreathouse

CRGreathouse is Offline:
Posts: 2,939
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Helper
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Re: Are primes just "random"?

Originally Posted by Gerenuk View Post
The problem you mentioned below to two categories:
- density/number of primes
- sums or difference of primes
That's probably biased toward my interests (combinatorial and additive number theory, respectively).

Originally Posted by Gerenuk View Post
Are there significant other theorems (apart from say existence and divisibility theorems like little Fermat's)?
Theorems? I've only talked about conjectures thus far. Interesting prime-related theorems:
  • Prime Number Theorem: there are about n/log n primes below n. (Rosser and Dusart have effective versions of this; Shoenfeld has a better effective version conditional on the RH.)
  • Green-Tao Theorem: the primes contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions
  • Bertrand's postulate: there is a prime between n and 2n
  • Vinogradov's theorem: All large enough odds are the sum of three primes.
  • Dirichlet's theorem: there are the 'expected number' of primes in arithmetic progressions (with a similar but effective by Brun & Titchmarsh)
  • ...
  Reply With Quote
image image
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Are primes just "random"?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Square Root of N" Law of Random Counts tony873004 Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 6 Sep19-08 08:50 PM
Are "selected for" mutations simply random occurences? Sundu Biology 4 Jul22-07 11:56 AM
Is the distribution of "almost-primes" known. tpm Number Theory 1 Apr6-07 01:29 PM
Question about "primes"... lokofer Number Theory 11 Sep8-06 01:41 PM
"primes" as Energy levels...(eigenvalues of a certain operator) eljose Number Theory 3 Jul18-06 12:32 AM

Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. © 2009 Physics Forums
Sciam | physorgPhysorg.com Science News Partner
image
image   image