Thread Closed

Is there a proof for this?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Mar25-09, 11:30 AM   #1
 

Is there a proof for this?


Hello,

let's say we have two functions of two variables: f(x,y) and g(x,y). Say we know that the sum / integral over all y's of f^n * g does not depend on x for every natural number n (and zero). Does that mean that f and g both don't depend on x?

Thanks
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Front-row seats to climate change
>> Attacking MRSA with metals from antibacterial clays
>> New formula invented for microscope viewing, substitutes for federally controlled drug
Mar25-09, 12:44 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Not necessarily. Let g(x,y)= 0 for all x and y. Then f^n*g (I assume you mean composition) is f^n(0) for all x and y so the sum/integral is a constant no matter what f is. If f^n*g is ordinary multiplication of functions, then f^n*g= 0 for all x and y and again, the integral is a constant no matter what f is.
 
Mar25-09, 01:40 PM   #3
 
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
If it's composition, then g better be a vector
 
Mar25-09, 04:32 PM   #4
 

Is there a proof for this?


Sorry for not being clear - f(x,y) and g(x,y) are scalar functions and * is ordinary multiplication. f^n is then f multiplied n times by itself. Now, if we don't assume the trivial null solution, f(x,y)=0 or g(x,y)=0, does my statement hold?
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Is there a proof for this?
Thread Forum Replies
Proof: Compare two integral(Please look at my surgested proof) Calculus & Beyond Homework 11
help with an proof Precalculus Mathematics Homework 10
Proof Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Proof: One more irrationality proof :) Introductory Physics Homework 5
A proof is a proof---says Canadian Prime Minister General Math 0