image
Physics Forums Logo
image
image
* Register * Upgrade Blogs Library Staff Rules Mark Forums Read
image
image   image
image

image proof Share It Thread Tools Search this Thread image
Old Mar26-09, 03:33 PM                  #1
a.katerina

a.katerina is Offline:
Posts: 3
proof

Hi,

i have just registered to the forum, because this time i study number theory and in some problems i can't figure out how to solve them.

This time i have to prove: If two integers x,y doesn't divided with 3 then the (x^2 - y^2) always is divided with 3.

Does any one has a clue how to start?

Thank you!
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar26-09, 03:37 PM                  #2
Office_Shredder

Office_Shredder is Online:
Posts: 1,795
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Helper
Re: proof

Break it up into what x and y modulo 3 can be (so four cases)
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar26-09, 03:51 PM                  #3
a.katerina

a.katerina is Offline:
Posts: 3
Re: proof

what?? Can you explain it a little bit, please?
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar26-09, 06:07 PM                  #4
HallsofIvy

PF Mentor

HallsofIvy is Offline:
Posts: 24,778
Re: proof

If x is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as x= 3k+1 or 3k+2 for some integer k.
If y is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as y= 3j+1 or 3j+2 for some integer k.

That gives 4 cases to consider:
1) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+1.
2) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+2.
3) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+1.
4) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+2.

Calculate LaTeX Code: x^2- y^2 for each of those cases.
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar26-09, 08:36 PM       Last edited by ramsey2879; Mar26-09 at 09:01 PM.. Reason: clarify            #5
ramsey2879

ramsey2879 is Offline:
Posts: 546
Blog Entries: 2
Re: proof

Originally Posted by HallsofIvy View Post
If x is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as x= 3k+1 or 3k+2 for some integer k.
If y is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as y= 3j+1 or 3j+2 for some integer k.

That gives 4 cases to consider:
1) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+1.
2) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+2.
3) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+1.
4) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+2.

Calculate LaTeX Code: x^2- y^2 for each of those cases.
Since +/- 0 = 0 are not cases 2 and 3 equivalent?

Since 2 = -1 and -1*-1 = 1 , (-1)^2 = (+1)^2 are not cases 1 and 4 equivalent?

Even better you can rewrite each term of an expression mod n before evaluating the expression mod n. Thus each of the terms can be rewriten mod 3 by substituting 0 for 3n and 1 for -1^2 (or 2^2) to get the equivalent expressions 1-1 = 0 mod 3 which is clearly correct.
  Reply With Quote
Old Apr1-09, 07:16 PM                  #6
a.katerina

a.katerina is Offline:
Posts: 3
Re: proof

Thank you very much for the help!! I'm grateful to you!
  Reply With Quote
image image
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: proof
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proof: Compare two integral(Please look at my surgested proof) Hummingbird25 Calculus & Beyond 11 Feb27-08 06:00 PM
Proof: One more irrationality proof :) mattmns Introductory Physics 5 Aug31-05 12:44 PM
Need help with a proof saint_n Introductory Physics 13 Sep24-04 09:41 AM
yet another proof Phymath Linear & Abstract Algebra 7 Sep23-04 09:56 PM
A proof is a proof---says Canadian Prime Minister marcus General Math 0 Sep1-03 11:56 PM

Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. © 2009 Physics Forums
Sciam | physorgPhysorg.com Science News Partner
image
image   image