Could monopoles ever be created in particle accelerators?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Forestman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the possibility of creating magnetic monopoles in particle accelerators, exploring theoretical perspectives, historical context, and implications for physics. It includes considerations of their existence, the conditions required for their creation, and their role in grand unified theories (GUTs).

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the creation of monopoles in particle accelerators, suggesting that they were not produced during the big bang.
  • Others argue that many believe monopoles were created in the big bang, linking their existence to grand unified theories (GUTs) and charge quantization.
  • A participant raises the question of whether monopoles could exist at all, emphasizing the need for initial experimental conditions to produce and detect them.
  • There is a viewpoint that a significant majority of high-energy physics theorists support the existence of monopoles in various theoretical frameworks, including GUTs and quantum gravity.
  • One participant mentions the "valentine monopole" as an interesting case in the context of monopole searches and the scientific process regarding evidence and belief in rare phenomena.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of monopoles or their potential creation in particle accelerators. Multiple competing views remain regarding their theoretical implications and the conditions necessary for their detection.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the uncertainty surrounding the existence of monopoles and the various theoretical frameworks that propose their existence, as well as the lack of definitive experimental evidence.

Forestman
Messages
212
Reaction score
2
Could monopoles ever be created in particle accelerators?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Forestman said:
Could monopoles ever be created in particle accelerators?

mmm … nobody else has replied, so I'll have a go :rolleyes:

I don't think anybody believes that any monopoles were even created in the big bang, so … no, not by us :smile:
 


Plenty of people believe monopoles were created in the big bang!

However these are often features of GUTs so it is not expected to see them created in particle accelerators.

Also, since the existence of magnetic monopoles gives us charge quantization (which we do see of course), there are theoretical niceties they provide. There's also the famed "valentine monopole", where a monopole search saw one. It is always an interesting topic for discussing the scientific process, since if something is really rare ... how many do you need to see before you believe they exist? The layman will usually say one. The scientist of course wants more :)
 


That's putting the cart before the horse...the real issue is whether magnetic monopoles exist or even could exist...then we can dither endlessly about necessary and sufficient initial experimental conditions to produce and possibly detect them.

Wiki has some insights, no definitive answer of course because none exists, at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopole.
 


The immense majority of HEP theorists believe in their existence in one guise or another. They show up ubiquitously in GUTs, topological theories, various field theories, as well as in nonperturbative physics and quantum gravity.

So while you can contrive scenarios where they don't appear, let's just say they have a huge parameter space of possible places to come out off. The added bonus is they explain charge quantization in a really simple and elegant way and are a beautiful exposition of geometry in quantum theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
626
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
22K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K