definition of the determinant i = 1"


by jeff1evesque
Tags: None
jeff1evesque
jeff1evesque is offline
#1
May1-09, 05:16 PM
P: 312
Lemma:Let B be an element in [tex]M_n_x_n(F)[/tex], where n >= 2. If row i of B equals [tex]e_k[/tex] for some k (1<= k <= n ), then det(B) = (-1)[tex]^i^+^kdet(B_i_k).[/tex]

Proof: The proof is by mathematical induction on n. The lemma is easily proved for n = 2. Assume that for some integer n >= 3, the lemma is true for (n-1) x (n-1) matrices, and let B be an nxn matrix in which row i of B equals [tex]e_k[/tex]for some k (1<=k<=n). The result follows immediately from the definition of the determinant i = 1.

Questions:
1. Can someone help me understand/prove the italized text above.. "...follows from immediately from the definition of the determinant i = 1"

2. And how does det(B) = (-1)[tex]^i^+^kdet(B_i_k).[/tex]? Why isn't there a coefficient in that equation [tex]B_i_,_k[/tex]? This questions is not necessary I guess- since If i follow and understand the proof in the book the logic will work out- but I always thought that in calculating a determinant there would be a scalar coefficient- thus: det(B) = [tex]B_i_,_k[/tex](-1)[tex]^i^+^kdet(B_i_k).[/tex]

thanks,


JL
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Lemurs match scent of a friend to sound of her voice
Repeated self-healing now possible in composite materials
'Heartbleed' fix may slow Web performance
tiny-tim
tiny-tim is offline
#2
May1-09, 06:40 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
tiny-tim's Avatar
P: 26,167
Hi jeff1evesque!

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box )
Quote Quote by jeff1evesque View Post
I always thought that in calculating a determinant there would be a scalar coefficient- thus: det(B) = [tex]B_i_,_k[/tex](-1)[tex]^i^+^kdet(B_i_k).[/tex]
Yes, that's right

but in this case, Bik is 1.
jeff1evesque
jeff1evesque is offline
#3
May1-09, 10:19 PM
P: 312
Quote Quote by tiny-tim View Post
Hi jeff1evesque!

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box )


Yes, that's right

but in this case, Bik is 1.
That would imply that every [tex]e_k = 1[/tex]. The symbol e stands for the standard ordered basis- for our particular row 1 correct? So for row i, are all the elements e (standard ordered basis) equal to 1? But how can you assume the ordered basis for our row is all 1's? The e's simply denote the order of the basis for this particular row [tex]F^n[/tex].

Thanks so much,


JL

tiny-tim
tiny-tim is offline
#4
May2-09, 03:39 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
tiny-tim's Avatar
P: 26,167

definition of the determinant i = 1"


Hi jeff1evesque!
Quote Quote by jeff1evesque View Post
That would imply that every [tex]e_k = 1[/tex]. The symbol e stands for the standard ordered basis- for our particular row 1 correct? So for row i, are all the elements e (standard ordered basis) equal to 1? But how can you assume the ordered basis for our row is all 1's? The e's simply denote the order of the basis for this particular row [tex]F^n[/tex].
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the notation, but I think it means that eg if row i of B equals e2, then row i is (0,1,0,0,)


Register to reply

Related Discussions
What are determinants useful for? General Math 9
Determinants Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Regarding Determinants Linear & Abstract Algebra 5
Determinants Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
more determinants! Calculus & Beyond Homework 7