How to Solve a Complex Rotation/Torque Problem for a Grindstone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brianjw
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a complex problem related to rotation and torque involving a grindstone. The original poster describes a scenario where a grindstone is subjected to various forces and torques, and they seek assistance in calculating the necessary tangential force to achieve specific angular velocities and to analyze the effects of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of frictional force and torque, the relationship between angular acceleration and time, and the need to clarify the setup involving the crank and the normal force from the axe. There are questions about the appropriate formulas to use and the correct units for angular acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationships between forces and torques, while others are exploring the implications of their calculations and questioning the assumptions made regarding the moment of inertia and the forces involved. There is an ongoing examination of the equations and their application to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential missing information regarding the mass of the crank and the need to express angular acceleration in radians per second squared. The original poster expresses confusion about the calculations and seeks clarification on the setup and methodology.

Brianjw
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
K this is the last problem for me in the Rotation/Torque section of my homework and its nuts. I've put it off after working on it for an hour and now I have to do it:

A 55.0-kg grindstone is a solid disk 0.520 m in diameter. You press an ax down on the rim with a normal force of 160 N . The coefficient of kinetic friction between the blade and the stone is 0.60, and there is a constant friction torque of 6.50 N*m between the axle of the stone and its bearings.

for a picture go here, trust me it helps a lot:

http://members.cox.net/brianjw/wheel.JPG

It has 3 questions:

1)How much force must be applied tangentially at the end of a crank handle 0.500 m long to bring the stone from rest to 120 rev/min in 9.00 s?

For this one I know I need to get the sum of the torques. But the crank and the way the axe is being onto the stone is confusing me. Also, what formula do I use that has time in it? Can't seem to find any from this section.

The next 2 I can't really solve cause the first part is stumping me.

2)After the grindstone attains an angular speed of 120 rev/min, what tangential force at the end of the handle is needed to maintain a constant angular speed of 120 rev/min?

3)How much time does it take the grindstone to come from 120 rev/min to rest if it is acted on by the axle friction alone?


Thanks for any input, even where to start would be greatly appreciated. I don't expect someone to give me an answer, just a nudge in the right direction!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Force of friction, like usual, = Normal force*Coefficient of kinetic friction.

After that, use [itex]\vec{\tau} = \vec{r} \times \vec{F} \Rightarrow |\tau| = rF[/itex] and add them up.

The kinematics of rotating things have direct analogs to the kinematics of linear things. In linear, we have

[tex]a\Delta t = \Delta v[/tex]

so that means in rotational we'll have

[tex]\alpha \Delta t = \Delta \omega[/tex]

cookiemonster
 
Last edited:
Brianjw said:
1)How much force must be applied tangentially at the end of a crank handle 0.500 m long to bring the stone from rest to 120 rev/min in 9.00 s?

For this one I know I need to get the sum of the torques. But the crank and the way the axe is being onto the stone is confusing me. Also, what formula do I use that has time in it? Can't seem to find any from this section.
You are told that the axe is producing a normal force. Like cookiemonster already pointed out, you can use this normal force to find the force of friction and the torque caused by this friction. The force you apply to the crank is perpendicular to the crank. You are given the length of the crank so you can calculate the torque on it.

I think you can take it from there.
 
I thought I understood but the numbers that I'm using aren't adding up:
[tex]Radius = .26m[/tex]

[tex]U_{k of axe} = .60[/tex]

[tex]Normal = 160N[/tex]

[tex]Mass = 55.0Kg[/tex]

[tex]I = .5*M*R^2[/tex]

[tex]Constant Torque = 6.50 N*m[/tex]

[tex]\sum\tau = .5m * F_{crank} - .26m*160N*.6 - 6.5N*m = I\alpha[/tex]
I also use:
[tex]\alpha \Delta t = \Delta \omega[/tex]

Using that I can get:

[tex]\alpha*9.0s = 2.0 Rev/s[/tex]
which implies:
[tex]\alpha = \frac{2.0}{9.0} Rev/s^2[/tex]
[tex].5m * F_{crank} - .26m*160N*.6 - 6.5N*m = 1.859kg*m^2* \frac{2.0}{9.0}Rev/s^2[/tex]
[tex]F_{crank} = 24.96N*m + 6.5N*m + 1.859kg*m^2* \frac{2.0}{9.0}Rev/s^2[/tex]

I know I'm missing something because the units are the right way, but not sure wha tI'm missing...
 
Last edited:
Brianjw said:
I thought I understood but the numbers that I'm using aren't adding up:
[tex]Radius = .26m[/tex]

[tex]U_{k of axe} = .60[/tex]

[tex]Normal = 160N[/tex]

[tex]Mass = 55.0Kg[/tex]

[tex]I = .5*M*R^2[/tex]

[tex]Constant Torque = 6.50 N*m[/tex]

[tex]\sum\tau = .5m * F_{crank} - .26m*160N*.6 - 6.5N*m = I\alpha[/tex]
You are computing the sum of the torques on the entire system (rim and crank) so the I on the RHS of the last equation should be the moment of inertia of the rim + crank. Since you don't know the mass of the crank, I suggest you reevaluate your methods.
 
Hmm, didn't think about that. I didn't see another torque equation, that I thought would work, in my notes, but I did find an equation:

[tex]\tau = mr^2\alpha[/tex]

Tried that and didn't work either. Hmm.
 
radians, not revolutions

Brianjw said:
I know I'm missing something because the units are the right way, but not sure wha tI'm missing...
Express [itex]\alpha[/itex] in the proper units: radians/sec^2.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K