Forces that depend only on distance

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fisico30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the invariance of equations involving forces that depend solely on distance, specifically in the context of classical mechanics and relativistic physics. It is established that Coulomb's force law is distance-dependent and does not change over time at a fixed location, yet the force experienced by an object can change as it moves. The conversation highlights that both Newton's laws and relativistic equations are covariant under Galilean and Lorentz transformations, respectively, confirming that time-independent forces are not a requirement for the invariance of physical laws across different reference frames.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's force law
  • Familiarity with Galilean transformations
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic concepts of Lorentz transformations in relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Newton's laws in non-inertial reference frames
  • Explore the relationship between force and motion in electromagnetic fields
  • Investigate the principles of covariant formulations in general relativity
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of Galilean and Lorentz transformations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of classical mechanics and relativity, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of force and motion across different reference frames.

fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
It is said that if a force depends only on distance (And not on time), the equations that involve those forces are invariant to a change of the frame of reference...is this true?

Coulomb's force law is only dependent on distance. At a certain space location the force has a value that does not change with time. But after the object is subjected to that force, it moves to a new spatial position and the force on it changes. So there is a change with time...

A time changing source generates a time changing field and therefore a time changing force on an object... what is special about these type of forces? Why don't they fit in the frame of reference transformations? after all, in classical mechanics time is absolute and distance differences are invariant...

thanks,
fisico30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
in classical mechanics, motion equations are invariant to changes of inertial reference frame.
Imagine the force acting on a particle given as a function of coordinates and time. Consider two mutually moving frames, with nocoinciding origins O, O'. The coordinates in these frames are related by Galilei transformation, which in the simplest case of two equally oriented coordinated systems and motion od S' along x with velocity v is

[tex] x' = x - vt,<br /> y' = y,<br /> z' = z,<br /> t' = t.[/tex]

(In general, x,y,z would enter in some linear combinatinons, but t' would be always t). Then in S and S' frames the equations of motion are

[tex] \mathbf F(x,y,z, t) = m\mathbf a(t)~~,~~\mathbf F'(x',y',z', t) = m\mathbf a'(t).[/tex]

The equations looks the same - every frame use its coordinates to describe the particle, but the form of law is the same. We say that Newton's law of motion is covariant with respect to Galilean transformations coordinates. Furthermore, because frames are inertial, forces are the same

[tex] \mathbf F(x,y,z, t) = \mathbf F' (x',y',z', t).[/tex]

There is no need to have the time independent force; equations are covariant in general.

In relativistic description (which is closer to reality), the equations are again covariant in respect to, but Lorentz transformation of coordinates, which in our special case is

[tex] x' = \gamma(x - vt),<br /> y' = y,<br /> z' = z,<br /> t' = \gamma(t-vx/c^2).[/tex]

For example, the law of motion of a particle in EM field is in S

[tex] qF^\mu_{~\nu}(x,y,z,t) u^\nu(t) = m\frac{d^2 x^\mu}{d\tau^2}(t)[/tex]

and in S'

[tex] qF'^\mu_{~\nu}(x',y',z',t') u^\nu(t') = m\frac{d^2 x'^\mu}{d\tau^2}(t').[/tex]

So there is no need to have the time independent force - formulae are invariant with respect to spacetime coordinate transformations in general.

Jano
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K