Simultaneous Differential Equations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical modeling of the motion of two charged particles using simultaneous differential equations. Participants explore methods for solving these equations, considering both theoretical and computational approaches, as well as the implications of extending the model to multiple particles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the system of differential equations governing the motion of two charged particles, emphasizing the complexity of finding exact solutions.
  • Another participant suggests considering a stochastic simulation approach, such as Monte Carlo methods, and questions the validity of the power 1.5 in the equations.
  • A different participant expresses uncertainty about the existence of an exact solution and proposes a system of equations based on initial conditions, suggesting the use of numerical methods like Euler's method for solving them.
  • One participant offers a vectorial formulation of the equations, discussing the conservation of momentum and the reduction of the problem to a single second-order differential equation, while also mentioning the possibility of eliminating time as a variable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the solvability of the equations or the best approach to take. Multiple competing views and methods are presented, reflecting uncertainty and differing opinions on the problem's complexity.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of initial conditions and the potential challenges in extending the model to more than two particles. There are also discussions about the assumptions underlying the equations and the implications of using different mathematical methods.

Dburghoff
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello, everyone! I'm working on a simulation of charged particles, and I'm trying to figure out a way to get exact equations which fit the particles' motions. However, I've arrived at math which is very difficult, so I thought that I'd ask for help. Basically, I want to know how to find the exact equations for two particles, and then I'll extend it to many of them.

So, imagine that there are two charged particles, y and Y. They each have the same mass and charge, so I'll ignore those aspects. Just know that the product of their charges and Coulomb's constant divided by their mass is a constant I'll dub k. Each has properties that pertain to it. The capital letters always refer to Y's properties, and the lowercase letters refer to y's. Their positions are known as (a,b) and (A,B). So, I know the following pieces of information, based on the force between the two:

[itex]\frac{d^{2}A}{dt^2}=\frac{k(A-a)}{((A-a)^2+(B-b)^2)^{1.5}}[/itex]
[tex]\frac{d^{2}B}{dt^{2}}=\frac{k(B-b)}{((A-a)^2+(B-b)^2)^{1.5}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d^2a}{dt^2}=\frac{k(a-A)}{((A-a)^2+(B-b)^2)^{1.5}}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d^2b}{dt^2}=\frac{k(b-B)}{((A-a)^2+(B-b)^2)^{1.5}}[/tex]

So, with just two particles, I have four differential equations. I have no idea how to solve it. BTW, I also know the particles' positions and velocities at time t=0, so you don't have to bother with the constants of integration. Just leave those C's as they are and I won't complain. :)

Also, I'd appreciate it if you showed me how to work through the problem. If I'm going to extend it to other problems, I'll need to know how. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds very complicated - have you considered a stochastic simulation (Monte Carlo)?
I think it is impossible to solve with more than two particles (?)

Is the power 1.5 correct (since I haven't studied your problem in details, I'm not sure)?
 
not sure if there would be an exact solution to this system
it would be nice to have some initial conditions on A, a, B, b, A', a', B', and b'
knowing that you can obtain a system of equations by letting
x1=A
x2=A'
x3=B
x4=B'
x5=a
x6=a'
x7=b
x8=b'

so that we have
x1'=x2
x2'=k/r*(x1-x5)
x3'=x4
x4'=k/r*(x3-x7)
x5'=x6
x6'=k/r*(x5-x1)
x7'=x8
x8'=k/r*(x7-x4)
where r=((A-a)^2+(B-b)^2)^(1.5)
then you can choose your favourite method, for example Eulers method
y_n+1=y_n+h*f(t,x)
take y0=your initial conditions
and f(t,x)=(x1',x2',x3',x4',x5',x6',x7',x8') evaluated at (t_n,x_n)
can take any h<1, your solution will be more accurate to closer to 0 h is, so take h as small as possible

you can code this into MATLAB and it will churn through the calculations quite nicely and you can also plot the solutions of A, a, B and b

hope that was helpful in some way
 
Last edited:
Let's write the equations in vectorial form:
[tex]\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{q_{1}q_{2}(\vec{r}_{1}-\vec{r}_{2})}{||\vec{r}_{1}-\vec{r}_{2}||^{3}}=m_{1}\frac{d^{2}\vec{r}_{1}}{dt^{2}}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{q_{1}q_{2}(\vec{r}_{2}-\vec{r}_{1})}{||\vec{r}_{1}-\vec{r}_{2}||^{3}}=m_{2}\frac{d^{2}\vec{r}_{2}}{dt^{2}}[/tex]

Note that the C.M moves with uniform speed, since there are no external forces. Let's set it to zero, and place the C.M at the origin.

We then have:
[tex]m_{1}\vec{r}_{1}+m_{2}\vec{r}_{2}=\vec{0}[/tex]

Hence, we may eliminate one particle path, and retain, for example:
[tex]\frac{m_{2}^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}(m_{1}+m_{2})^{2})}\frac{q_{1}q_{2}\vec{r}_{1}}{||\vec{r}_{1}||^{3}}=m_{1}\frac{d^{2}\vec{r}_{1}}{dt^{2}}[/tex]

Since we have a central force, we have motion in a plane only, and the angular momentum with respect to the origin is constant through time.

Write
[tex]\vec{r}_{1}(t)=r(t)(\cos\theta(t)\vec{i}+\sin\theta(t)\vec{j})=r(t)\vec{i}_[r}[/tex]
We then have:
[tex]\vec{v}_{1}(t)=\dot{r}\vec{i}_{r}+r\dot{\theta}\vec{i}_{\theta}[/tex]
Or, for conservation of angular momentum:
[tex]r^{2}\dot{\theta}=r_{0}^{2}\dot{\theta}_{0}[/tex]

The radial component of the equation of motion may now be written as:
[tex]\frac{A}{r^{2}}=-\frac{(r_{0}^{2}\dot{\theta}_{0})^{2}}{r^{3}}+\frac{d^{2}r}{dt^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]r_{0}[/tex] is the initial radius, [tex]\dot{\theta}_{0}[/tex] the initial angular velocity, A is some constant.

Hence, your problem has been reduced to solve a single, 2.order differential equation.
Alternatively, you may eliminate time as a variable, and regard the radius as a function of the angle (this will give you the form of the path, but not the traversal times).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K