Solving Torque and Tension for a Cylindrical Hoop with Mass and Radius R

  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylindrical
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a cylindrical hoop of mass M and radius R, with a string wrapped around it, as it falls. Participants are tasked with determining the torque about the center of mass and the tension in the string as functions of time.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods including angular momentum, conservation of energy, and Newton's second law. There are questions about the dependency of torque on time and the assumptions regarding acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided alternative approaches and expressed frustration with their initial attempts. There is acknowledgment of the complexity of the equations involved, and a few participants are questioning their assumptions about the system's dynamics.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of imposed homework rules and the need to derive expressions without providing complete solutions. Participants are encouraged to explore their reasoning and clarify their understanding of the physical principles at play.

e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
I have a cylindrical hoop of mass M and radius R with string (presumably thin and massless) wrapped around it. I take the end of the string from the hoop and let the hoop fall. (a) What is the torque about the CM of the hoop as a function of time? (b) What is the tension of the string as a function of time?

For (a), I decided to use angular momentum and then using the relation [itex]\tau = dL/dt[/itex] to find the torque. I get L = RMv(t) where v(t) = gt and so dL/dt = RMg. I know something is wrong here since the torque is NOT dependent on time. For (b)...well, I can't do (b) since I need to solve (a) first.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure, but I'd use conservation of energy. The rotational energy and translational energy should have some constant relationship, and the sum of those energies should give the decrease in gravitational energy. I would imagine with this you could express everything in terms of x(t), x'(t), or x''(t). With x''(t) -- the acceleration -- you can find angular acceleration and thus torque.
 
Torque is only being applied by the string. Find out how much less is the acceleration than g, and from that, you can find the tension in the string. This tension times the radius is the torque.
 
AKG said:
I'm not sure, but I'd use conservation of energy.
Good idea. I just get frustrated whenever I employ a method that 'should' work and doesn't.

So by conservation of energy

[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> 0 &= \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 + \frac{1}{2}Mv^2 + Mgy \\<br /> &= \frac{Iv^2}{2R^2} + \frac{1}{2}Mv^2 + Mgy \\<br /> &= \frac{v^2}{2}(I/R^2 + M) + Mgy<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

Solving for v

[tex]v= \sqrt{\frac{-2Mgy}{I/R^2 + M}}[/tex]

This seems awfully weird and complex (and I'm too lazy to solve such an ugly diff. eq.). There must be a simpler way in my opinion.
 
[tex]k = \sqrt{\frac{2M}{I/R^2 + M}}[/tex]

[tex]v = k\sqrt{-y}[/tex]

[tex]y' = k\sqrt{-y}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dy}{dt} = k\sqrt{-y}[/tex]

[tex](-y)^{-1/2}dy = kdt[/tex]

[tex]-2\sqrt{-y} = kt[/tex]

[tex]y = -\left (\frac{kt}{2} \right )^2[/tex]

Find y'', and you're done. Oh, of course there should be a constant in the equation for y (i.e a "+ C" or "+ [itex]y_0[/itex]) but you can arbitrarily set that to zero, which I suggest you do.

EDIT: used proper sign convention; was too lazy/sick/tired to do it yesterday.
 
Last edited:
AKG said:
...
[tex]y = \left (\frac{kt}{2} \right )^2[/tex]

Find y'', and you're done. Oh, of course there should be a constant in the equation for y (i.e a "+ C" or "+ [itex]y_0[/itex]) but you can arbitrarily set that to zero, which I suggest you do. Oh, and I haven't taken sign into account, so it might be [itex]y = - \left (\frac{kt}{2} \right ) ^2[/itex], but I'll leave that to you.
This is all fine and dandy, but what I want to know is why my first attempt didn't work. Argh...
 
e(ho0n3 said:
For (a), I decided to use angular momentum and then using the relation [itex]\tau = dL/dt[/itex] to find the torque. I get L = RMv(t) where v(t) = gt and so dL/dt = RMg. I know something is wrong here since the torque is NOT dependent on time. For (b)...well, I can't do (b) since I need to solve (a) first.

What am I doing wrong?
What makes you think the torque is dependent on time?
And what makes you think that the acceleration = g!

Just apply Newton's 2nd law (or conservation of energy). There are two forces acting on the hoop: tension and weight.

Also: I hope you realize that the expressions that you and AKG found are not "awfully weird and complex" and that the resulting differential equation is trivial. (It's just uniformly accelerated motion! :smile: )
 
Doc Al said:
And what makes you think that the acceleration = g!
Ah! There is my error. You'll have to forgive my as I am a borderline retard.

Also: I hope you realize that the expressions that you and AKG found are not "awfully weird and complex" and that the resulting differential equation is trivial. (It's just uniformly accelerated motion! :smile: )
Anything with a square root looks ugly to me for some reason, hence my statement. I have to stop judging things by the way they look.

Thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
3K