Limits and continuity for complex functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of a complex function defined as f(z) = (1/(z-a))(1/z^2 - 1/a^2) at the point z = a, where a is a fixed complex value. Participants are exploring how to define f(a) to ensure continuity at that point.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the limit of f(z) as z approaches a and its implications for defining f(a). There is mention of using the delta/epsilon definition of continuity, and questions arise about how to apply this definition in the context of complex functions. Some participants suggest that differentiability may provide insights into continuity, while others seek to avoid differentiation in their justification.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various perspectives on how to approach the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between differentiability and continuity, but there is no explicit consensus on the best method to justify the continuity using the delta/epsilon definition.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of justifying continuity without relying on differentiation, highlighting the complexity of the problem in the context of complex analysis. There is an acknowledgment of the need for a rigorous approach to continuity in this scenario.

jaejoon89
Messages
187
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given

f(z) = (1/(z-a))(1/z^2 - 1/a^2)

a is a fixed complex value


If you define a function over the complex numbers by mapping z to f(z) when z is not equal to a, how should this function be defined at a s.t. it's continuous at point a? Explain.

Homework Equations



A function will be continuous at a if

lim(z->a) f(z) = f(a)

The Attempt at a Solution



f(z) = -(z+a) / (z^2 a^2)
lim(z->a) = -2/a^2 = f(a)

I'm really not sure how to explain it or "justify it" as I'm supposed to beyond the 2 lines written above.

I'm really not sure what else is needed... If a is an interior point of the domain (?) then can't continuity be shown using the delta/epsilon definition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if you took the limit as z -> a, then that expression is just the derivative of 1/z^2 at a, and differentiability implies continuity so...
 
Thanks, but I think I'm supposed to justify it more along the lines of the delta/epsilon definition, or some other way without talking about differentiation. Which is back to my original question: how do you do that here?

I know that for any real number ε > 0 there exists a real number δ > 0 s.t. | f(z) − a | < ε for all complex numbers that satisfy | z − a | < δ. But how do I show this for this function?
 
Last edited:
Well either way, it seems like you need to know about differentiability to even figure out how to define f at a so that f is continuous or else you can't really prove continuity but then this all seems kind of pointless since differentiability implies continuity is the most basic result once differentiability has been defined.

But whatever, so basically f(a) = -2/a^3 right. So then you start with

\left|\frac{\frac{1}{z^2} - \frac{1}{a^2}}{z-a} + \frac{2}{a^3}\right| &lt; \varepsilon

and you should end up with

\left|\frac{(z-a)(2z + a)}{a^3 z^2}\right| &lt; \varepsilon.

Fill in the steps in between and/or check that what I wrote down is actually correct. Can you do the rest from here?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K