
#1
Jul1204, 07:33 PM

Emeritus
PF Gold
P: 8,147

I just got my brand new copy of Barton Zwiebach's A First Course in String Theory and it's sure different from Polchinski or GSW! Here's the info.
It's aimed at undergraduates; it was developed from a course given to MIT sophomores. Now you can assume that MIT sophs are better prepared than sophs at most other instituions, but still.. All he requires is "exposed to special relativity, basic quantum mechanics, electromagnetism, introductory statistical physics. Some familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics is useful but not indispensable." I think that many members of this forum could swing that. His aim is to bring the students to the cutting edge as quickly and honestly as possible; this constrains him. He introduces and uses lightcone coordinates and quantization, and postpones covariant quantization till much later. He starts off with relativity in the LC framework, pulls in multiple dimensions, and then goes into "manifestly relativistic electrodynamics". All this before the first string chapter. He does bosonic strings, often motivating with a prior chapter on the corresponding point particle. His math is appropriate to his audience, he doesn't use anything deeper than basic multivariable calculus without introducing, motivating, and explaining it first. But be aware, he does go the true route and if you're not prepared to do the excercises you'll miss the value of the book. Part 2 is developments. He does Dbranes, string charge, string thermodynamics and black holes, Tduality, EM fields on Dbranes, nonlinear electrodynamics, finally the covariant quantization, strings and Riemann surfaces, and loop amplitudes in string theory. This is going to be not only a popular textbook, but a lifeline for autodidacts. If you've got any questions about the book I'll try to answer them on this thread. Remember, though, I've just received the book, and haven't read it in depth. 



#2
Jul1204, 07:57 PM

P: 915

Oh, I have envy. I possess the two Polchinski's volumes, but this new for sure must incorporate the last developments




#3
Jul1304, 10:50 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 660





#4
Jul1304, 10:59 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,190

Zwiebach's New SST book
If string theory ever gets experimental support, will students no longer be required to learn the nonstringy form of quantum mechanics? Or will learning that oldfashioned form of particle physics always be considered a prerequisite to learning string stuff, in the same way that students are still expected to learn Newtonian mechanics before moving on to quantum mechanics?




#5
Jul1404, 09:58 AM

Emeritus
PF Gold
P: 8,147

In Zwiebach's book, chapter two, the first "real"chapter, starts with relativity, introduces light cone coordinates (an advanced topic) then extra dimensions and orbifolds (another advanced topic, but done with very simple examples), then quantum mechanics and the one dimensional particle in a well. All this is aimed at developing math modeling and calculation skills rather than "teaching a subject". So string theory when it comes will all be underpinned by skills learned on relativity and quantum mechanics.




#6
Jul1404, 09:18 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,190





#7
Jul2004, 09:35 AM

P: 915

I have the book!
Although there are parts of it that seem chinese to me, i will try to absorbe the major part possible 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Zwiebach's string theory book  Beyond the Standard Model  113  
Zwiebach's A First Course in String Theory  Beyond the Standard Model  9  
Particle Data Book, as a BOOK  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  14 