How Is Speed Calculated in Elastic Collisions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chickens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of speed in elastic collisions, particularly focusing on the conservation of momentum and energy principles. Participants are exploring the definitions of work and energy as they relate to the problem at hand.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to define work and energy, and are discussing the implications of conservation laws in the context of elastic collisions. There are questions about the relationship between momentum and energy, particularly regarding the assumptions made in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between energy and momentum. There is an ongoing exploration of the necessary energy to tip a block and how that relates to the speed of the ball during the collision.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which require them to demonstrate their understanding and reasoning rather than simply providing answers. There is a noted confusion regarding the application of conservation principles and the definitions of kinetic and potential energy.

chickens
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Do help me in the question below. Thanks in advance.

http://forum.lowyat.net/uploads/post-68-1089800451.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
If you've read the guidelines, you would see that no one will bother to do your homework, but are willing to help you out provided you show what you've done so far.
So, to begin with:
How would you define work and energy ? (Question a)
 
Oh, let's see,

Q a )Work - The work done by a constant force F when the displacement of its point of application in S is given by the scalar products of F and S.

Energy - Energy enables a body to do work.

I also did b (i) (ii), c (i) ...after that I'm stuck on the following questions...

for c (ii) i assume mu^2 = (m1+m2)V (conservation of momentum principle) but i wasn't able to get the answer :/

Please help me .
 
Last edited:
Much better!
But, what on Earth do you mean by:
"for c (ii) i assume mu^2 = (m1+m2)V (conservation of momentum principle)"
Are we talking momentum or energy here??

Now to help yo along a bit, let [tex]E_{0}[/tex] be the original energy of the ball just as it strikes the square.
We let P stand for the potential energy increase the square gains by changing from position (a) to position (b) (you have already calculated P, right?).

What does it mean that, by transferring 30% of [tex]E_{0}[/tex] to the square, the square is "just able to reach position (b)"?
Surely, this must mean that the square falls to rest at (b), that is, has no velocity!
Hence, the initial kinetic energy of the square is [tex]\frac{30}{100}E_{0}[/tex]
whereas its final potential energy (measured relative to the initial position) is given by P.
By conservation of mechanical energy, we should have:
[tex]\frac{30}{100}E_{0}=P[/tex]
 
Yes I do understand that formula. But in c(ii), it wants the speed at which the ball strikes the block. During a very short period, the ball will touch the block eventhough its a elastic collision...so that's why i assume [tex]mu^2 = (m_{1}+m_{2})v[/tex] but i really don't know if that's correct.
 
Last edited:
chickens said:
Yes I do understand that formula. But in c(ii), it wants the speed at which the ball strikes the block. During a very short period, the ball will touch the block eventhough its a elastic collision...so that's why i assume [tex]mu^2 = (m_{1}+m_{2})v[/tex] but i really don't know if that's correct.
It's not only not correct, it's nonsense. :smile: Energy and momentum are two different things--they don't even have the same units! So... don't mix them up.

There is no question that mechanical energy is conserved: it's stated in the problem. So use that fact.

arildno explained how to approach this problem. But let me ask a few questions that may lead you in the same direction: (1) How much energy is needed to tip the block? (you already calculated that before you got to question c) (2) If that energy is 30% of the ball's original KE, how much is the ball's original KE? (3) If you know the KE, what's the speed?

You say you got the answer for c (i)? How did you get it? If so, the answer for c (ii) follows from the definition of kinetic energy: [itex]KE = 1/2 mv^2[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K