Having a bit of trouble with Electric currents and resistance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a resistor combination that remains temperature independent, specifically involving a carbon resistor and a Nichrome wire wound resistor. Participants explore the concept of temperature dependence of resistance and seek to determine the appropriate values for each resistor to achieve this condition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to make the resistor combination temperature independent and seeks clarification on the concept.
  • Another participant suggests that the resistivity of carbon increases with temperature while Nichrome decreases, proposing that the increase in one should compensate for the decrease in the other.
  • A formula for resistance as a function of temperature is provided, including temperature coefficients for carbon and Nichrome.
  • Concerns are raised about the stability and consistency of carbon resistors across different units, suggesting that the initial assumptions may not hold universally.
  • One participant questions the applicability of the equations presented, indicating that they have not yet learned the material referenced.
  • A later reply proposes that connecting the resistors in parallel might be a better approach to mitigate heating effects and maintain temperature independence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to achieve temperature independence, with some supporting the series connection and others advocating for a parallel connection. There is no consensus on the optimal method or the specific resistor values needed.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of the temperature coefficients and the implications of resistor configurations. There is uncertainty regarding the stability of carbon resistors and the validity of the proposed equations over varying temperature ranges.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and practitioners in materials science, electrical engineering, and physics, particularly those exploring the effects of temperature on electrical resistance and resistor design.

Divergent13
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hey there! This question has be a bit confused as to where to start---

Suppose you made a 4.70 k-Ohm resistor from a carbon resistor and a Nichrome wire wound resistor connected together so the total resistance is the sum of their separate resistances. What value should each of these resistors have (at 0 degrees Celsius) so the combination is temperature independent?

My question is how can we make it temperature independent? I am having trouble in general---- understanding what that means...

Any help would be greatly appreciated thank you.

A lot of the ideas in this chapter play a big role in materials science so I am quite interested in this part of the course--- more so than mechanics :]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Off the top of my head, I don't know. Apparently, the resistivity of one material will increase with temperature while the other will decrease. Then, you would want the resulting increase in resistance to compensate for the resulting decrease in resistance. You are probably just supposed to determine this for small variations around 0oC. I will look into this further and come back to share what I have found.



What I found (source: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/restmp.html):

R = R0 {1 + αΔT}

Where R is the resistance, R0 is the resistance at 0oC in your case, α is the temperature coefficient of resistance, and ΔT is the temperature in oC in your case.

carbon: αC = -5E-4 per Co

nichrome: αN = 4E-4 per Co

Then, you want

Rtotal = constant = RC + RN

where RC = R0,C {1 + αCΔT}

and RN = R0,N {1 + αNΔT}
 
Last edited:
Agree with Turin -- these cancellations only are valid over a small range of temerature and you cannot expect carbon to be very stable or repetitive from one resistor to the next.
 
Interesting, we have not learned what is shown on the site that turin has found. If you have any more suggestions please post. But if not then Ill try to work with what turin has stated.
 
divergent,
You may have learned a simple and straighforward equation into which you simply plug the temperature coefficients. The crap that I have listed is the next level down in the derivation.
 
What you posted doesn't seem like its bad, I was able to get solution that both Rs added get 4.5...
 
After thinking somemore about it, I think it would be better to connect the resistors in parallel, rather than series. You want:

Rtotal = RNRC / (RN + RC) = constant.

That way, you alleviate more of the heating effect that would take the resistors far away from the 0oC point by reducing the current that goes through them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
17K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K