Unraveling the Mystery of Photon Masslessness

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kamataat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery Photon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of photon masslessness, exploring why photons are considered massless while traveling at the speed of light. Participants examine the implications of rest mass and inertial mass, referencing principles from relativity and quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that according to E=mc^2, normal objects cannot reach the speed of light due to increasing mass with energy, while photons, being massless, can travel at light speed.
  • There is a distinction made between inertial mass and proper mass, with some arguing that proper mass is not a function of speed, while inertial mass varies with speed.
  • One participant questions whether photons have rest mass, suggesting that their energy cannot be zero even at rest, referencing the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
  • Another participant clarifies that current observations indicate photons do not have rest mass and that their energy is not zero.
  • There is a discussion about tardyons (particles moving slower than light) and luxons (particles moving at light speed), with the claim that the inertial mass of photons is not dependent on speed.
  • One participant raises a question about the categorization of particles with only rest mass or only inertial mass, seeking clarification on their differences.
  • A participant introduces a question about dark matter and its classification, inquiring about the characteristics that differentiate various types of matter.
  • Another participant presents a formula related to proper massless particles, suggesting its application in astrophysics, specifically for x-ray and gamma ray contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of mass in relation to photons, with no consensus reached on whether photons possess any form of mass or how to categorize different types of matter.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the ambiguity in definitions of mass, the dependence on interpretations of relativistic principles, and unresolved questions regarding the categorization of matter types.

Kamataat
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I understand that according to E=mc^2 any normal object can't reach the speed of light because the energy of its motion increases its mass and thus you'd need an infinite amount of energy to reach c. However, it is said that objects with no mass (i.e. photons) travel at the speed of light. Why is it said that they have no mass? Isn't it true that even they have a rest mass (because their energy can never be zero even at rest according to the Heisenberg Uncertainity Principle)? If so, then how can they reach the speed of light if they have a mass like any other object or particle?

P.S. I know only high school mathematics and physics so please try to avoid anything more serious. I only want to get a simple explanation of the principles.

- Kamataat
 
Science news on Phys.org
Kamataat said:
I understand that according to E=mc^2 any normal object can't reach the speed of light because the energy of its motion increases its mass and thus you'd need an infinite amount of energy to reach c.
This is a topic which comes up quite often. The answer is that the inertial mass (aka relativistic mass), defined as the ratio of the magnitude of the particle's momentum to the particle's speed, increases with increasing speed and that the proper mass (aka rest mass) is not a function of speed. Different people use the term "mass" to refer to different things. Some use it to refer to inertial mass while others use it to refer to proper mass.
However, it is said that objects with no mass (i.e. photons) travel at the speed of light.
When they say that they are not referring to the particle's inertial mass, they are referring to the particle's proper mass, i.e. the one that is not a function of speed.
Isn't it true that even they have a rest mass (because their energy can never be zero even at rest according to the Heisenberg Uncertainity Principle)?
According to current observations, photons do not have rest mass. And it is incorrect to claim that the energy of a photon is zero. The energy of a photon is related to the photon's inertial mass m through E = mc2.

Pete
 
So photons don't have a proper mass, but do have an inertial mass? But if the inertial mass increases with speed, then how can a photon reach the speed of light?

- Kamataat
 
Kamataat said:
So photons don't have a proper mass, but do have an inertial mass? But if the inertial mass increases with speed, then how can a photon reach the speed of light?

- Kamataat
The inertial mass is a function of speed only for tardyons and not for luxons. A tardyon is defined as a particle that always moves with a speed v < c whereas luxon is defined as a particle that always moves with speed v = c (To be complete: A tachyon is defined as a particle which always moves with speed v > c). Therefore, since relativitiy tells us that photons always travel at the same speed, c, the inertial mass of a photon is not a function of speed.

Pete
 
Obviously, particles that have only rest mass or only inertial have their own catogory of matter?, how are they diffrent?
 
Mk said:
Obviously, particles that have only rest mass or only inertial have their own catogory of matter?, how are they diffrent?


Oooops, I ment:

obviously, particles that have only rest mass or only inertial don't have their own category of matter. How are they diffrent than stuff that has both?
 
By the way, is dark matter if it exists another form of matter? The diffrent forms of matter differ in how much empty space is in it and the density of the empty space. Right or no right so far? Is it the bonds, how long the chains are? Where do you draw the line between the diffrent types of matter? Is there a list or system or something where, it says where you draw the line, between the now 7 types of matter? I guess I just want to know how they are diffrent past all the, solids hold their shape stuff

-A confused person all of a sudden :confused: :cry:

Muy big thanks :)
 
I believe the equation for proper massless particles looks like this: [tex]E^2={m^2}{c^4}+{p^2}{c^2}[/tex]where p=momentum
This formula is used in x-ray and gamma ray astrophysics.
Obviously if the particle were at rest, p=0, which would bring you back to [tex]E=mc^2[/tex]

Paden Roder
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K