Conservation of Momentum in a Spaceship Explosion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of momentum in a spaceship explosion involving three sections with specific masses and velocities. The initial approach using kinetic energy calculations was incorrect, leading to an erroneous velocity for the third section. The correct method involved vector summation of momentum, accounting for direction and sign. The final calculated velocity for the third section is 1.46 x 107 m/s, aligning with the book's solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum principles
  • Familiarity with vector mathematics and directionality
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy equations, specifically KE=(1/2)mv2
  • Basic arithmetic skills for handling large numbers and scientific notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector addition and subtraction in physics
  • Learn about momentum conservation in different types of collisions
  • Review examples of internal explosions and their effects on momentum
  • Explore advanced kinetic energy concepts in non-conservative systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and momentum, as well as anyone interested in solving complex physics problems involving explosions and vector analysis.

Beers Law
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have become frusturated at a conservation of momentum problem. A space ship(ss) with a mass of 2.0*10^6 [kg] is crusing at a speed of 5.0*10^6 [m/s], when it blows up. One section(s1), with mass 5.0*10^5 [kg] is blown straight backwards at a speed of 2.0*10^6 [m/s]. The second section(s2), with mass 8.0*10^5 [kg], continues forwards at a speed of 1.0*10^6 [m/s]. A third section moves at a certain speed.

Trying to find the speed of the third section, I initally approached the problem as a kinetic energy problem, considering that I might be able to use KE=(1/2)mv^2 and simply subtract s1+s2 from ss because the explosion is internal and the change in kinetic energy will be 0:

First, the third section has a mass of 7.0*10^5[kg]

KE(ss)=2.5*10^19 [J]
KE(s1)= 1.0*10^18 [J]
KE(s2)= 4.0*10^17 [J]

KE(s1+s2)= 1.4*10^18[J]

So I subtracted this from KE(ss):

2.5*10^19 [J]-1.4*10^18[J]= 2.36*10^19 [J], which is the KE for the third section

Then I set up 2.36*10^19 [J] = (1/2)*(7.0*10^5)(v_s3)^2, and I obtained a velocity for the third section of v_s3= 7.93*10^6 [m/s]! The solution in the back of the book reads 1.46*10^7 [m/s].

So, ok, this is obviously not the correct way to set up this problem, so I did vector sum for momentum using p(vector)=m*v(vector).

The spaceship has a vector 9.45*10^12 [kg*m/s]
Section1 has vector 1.144*10^12 [kg*m/s]
Section2 has vector 1.105*10^12 [kg*m/s]

Section 3 has mass of 7.5*10^5 [kg]. I subtracted section1+section2 vectors from the spaceship vector, and the result was 7.201*10^12 [kg*m/s]. Then I inserted this back into the p(vector)=m*v(vector):

7.201*10^12 [kg*m/s]= 7.5*10^5[kg] * v

I solved for v and received 9.6*10^6[m/s].

Im obviously not doing something right. I think I may not be factoring in that these are vectors? Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Beers Law said:
Trying to find the speed of the third section, I initally approached the problem as a kinetic energy problem, considering that I might be able to use KE=(1/2)mv^2 and simply subtract s1+s2 from ss because the explosion is internal and the change in kinetic energy will be 0:
Forget about KE. It's not conserved in an explosion.

First, the third section has a mass of 7.0*10^5[kg]
Right.

...

So, ok, this is obviously not the correct way to set up this problem, so I did vector sum for momentum using p(vector)=m*v(vector).
Right, but realize that vectors have direction. (Or at least a sign.)

The spaceship has a vector 9.45*10^12 [kg*m/s]
Why 9.45? 2.0 x 5.0 = 10. And in what direction? Call it the positive x-direction.
Section1 has vector 1.144*10^12 [kg*m/s]
Section2 has vector 1.105*10^12 [kg*m/s]
Again, check your arithmetic. Section 1 moves backwards: that's the negative x-direction; Section 2 moves forward: the positive x-direction.

Section 3 has mass of 7.5*10^5 [kg].
Yet another arithmetic error!
I subtracted section1+section2 vectors from the spaceship vector, and the result was 7.201*10^12 [kg*m/s].
Careful! Signs matter.
Im obviously not doing something right. I think I may not be factoring in that these are vectors? Thanks for any help.
Two main mistakes: (1) arithmetic errors (2) not properly treating the sign (which represents the direction, in this case) of the vectors.
 
Thanks for the help. Here is what I have done.

The Ship has a vector of +1.0*10^13.
Section 1 has a vector of -1.0*10^12.
Section 2 has a vector of +8.0*10^11
So, section 3 has a vector of 1.02*10^13, which I set up this way:

1.02*10^13= 700000*v, which returns 1.457*10^7, which is most excellent.

My mistakes are fairly embarassing, but not keeping things organized and thinking too far ahead are my achilles heel with physics.

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K