| Thread Closed |
Bounded Operators |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb10-10, 05:08 AM | #1 |
|
|
Bounded Operators
hi.
i'm reading "quantum mechanics in hilbert space" and a don't get a basic point for bounded operators. def. 1 a set S in a normed space [tex]N[/tex] is bounded if there is a constant C such that [tex]\left\| f \right\| \leq C ~~~~~ \forall f \in S[/tex] def. 2 a transformation is called bounded if it maps each bounded set into a bounded set. and now comes the part i don't understand. for linear operators [tex]T: N_1 \rightarrow N_2[/tex] def. 2 is equivalent to: there exists a constant C such that [tex]\left\| T f \right\| \leq C \left\| f \right\| ~~~~~ \forall f \in N_1[/tex] this is stated without a proof. i don't think it's obvious or at least not to me. i'm thinking of a map, for example from the real numbers (normed space) to the real numbers, where the bounded set [tex]N_1=(0,1][/tex] is transformed in a way to another interval say [tex]N_2=(a,b][/tex] now the norm of elements from [tex]N_1[/tex] can get arbitrary small. So there can't exist a constant fulfilling [tex]\left\| T f \right\| \leq C \left\| f \right\| ~~~~~ \forall f \in N_1[/tex] when the norm of all elements of [tex]N_2[/tex] has a lower bound say [tex]m>0[/tex]. Or is such a map forbidden because of the continuity (zero has to be mapped on zero) and bounded linerar operators are continuous and vice verca? i would be glad if someone can show me a proof or a source where a can get one. thanks and greetings. |
| Feb10-10, 06:20 AM | #2 |
|
|
Clearly, the '<=' implication is true. For suppose that ||Tf|| <= C ||f||. Take N1 to be a bounded set. That means that for all f, ||f|| <= C' for some constant C'. So clearly, ||Tf|| <= C C' where the right hand side is again a constant.
As for the direct implication '=>' ... I didn't quite see it right away. How to connect the statement about bounded sets to a statement about any subset of S eludes me right now. If I think of something I will let you know :) |
| Feb10-10, 07:16 AM | #3 |
|
Mentor
|
Suppose that T takes bounded sets to bounded sets. The set of all vectors of the form [tex]\frac{f}{\|f\|}[/tex] is bounded, so there must exist a C such that
[tex]\|T\frac{f}{\|f\|}\|\leq C[/tex] This implies [itex]\|Tf\|\leq C\|f\|[/itex]. To prove the converse, suppose instead that there exists a C such that [itex]\|Tf\|\leq C\|f\|[/itex] for all f, and let B be a bounded set with bound M (i.e. [itex]\|g\|\leq M[/itex] for all g in B). We need to show that there exists an upper bound for the set of all [itex]\|Tg\|[/itex] with g in B. [tex]\|Tg\|\leq C\|g\|\leq CM[/tex] If you're also wondering why an operator is continuous if and only if it's bounded, the Wikipedia page titled "bounded operator" has a very nice proof of that. |
| Feb10-10, 07:25 AM | #4 |
|
|
Bounded Operators
Great!
Many thanks to both of you. |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Bounded Operators
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Pointwise bounded, uniformly continuous family of functions locally uniformly bounded | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 0 | ||
| what does it mean for a set to be bounded?? | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 2 | ||
| Every sequence of bounded functions that is uniformly converent is uniformly bounded | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 4 | ||
| A question on bounded linear operators (Functional Analysis) | Calculus | 23 | ||
| Do quantum fluctuations bounded above correspond to those bounded below? | General Astronomy | 0 | ||