
#1
Feb2210, 05:37 PM

P: 210

Do you think that A Brief History of Time is a worthwhile read? I am a high school senior with an interest in physics




#2
Feb2210, 11:02 PM

P: 538

I didn't find The Universe in a Nutshell by Stephen Hawking enlightening at all, so I doubt A Brief History of Time is any better. I didn't even finish the book because of its lack of real content. So I'm not impressed by Hawking's writing, as it is very superficial. His books are more for the general public than someone actually interested in physics. You would be much better off reading everything by George Gamow and Richard Feynman. They are much more interesting and fun to read than Hawking, plus their texts contain oodles of substance. I would start off with Gamow.
I also recommend Understanding Physics by Isaac Asimov. This book requires no calculus and only high school math, but it contains a lot of interesting physics. It is very thick and comprehensive, so it will keep you busy. Gamow's books are fun because they are shorter. Plus, he writes so well that they are a quick read. 



#3
Feb2210, 11:07 PM

P: 210

Just to give some more background I do know calculus (through multi variable) so I can handle a book that has some rigor to it. That being said, I do not want a book that is too dry or something that is more of a pain than enjoyment. Ill look into gamow and feynman.




#4
Feb2210, 11:24 PM

P: 538

A Brief History of Time
Then you might give Feynman's lecture series a try if you're interested in physics. I've never read them, but it might be tough going at first if you don't know much physics. I really don't know though.
Either that or you can try out a vector calculus book to learn some very important math. I would recommend Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms: A Unified Approach by John Hubbard. If you can make it through this book, you will be light years ahead of your fellow physics, math, or engineering majors if that's what you end up doing. 



#5
Feb2310, 12:50 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,276

Brief History of Time was one of my favourite books. Definitely worth it a read.




#6
Feb2310, 02:38 AM

P: 49





#7
Mar1310, 10:33 PM

P: 2

I liked it, it taught me quite a lot, though I recommend a solid back ground studying physics. He gets serious fast, its starts simple enough, but I got lost in it near the end of it.




#8
Mar1310, 10:38 PM

P: 210





#9
Mar1310, 10:44 PM

P: 2





#10
Mar1510, 06:35 PM

P: 530

You'll be able to read every single popular account of physics without any mathematical background & understand most of them.
I've read so many before & understood most of them well, a few did get crazy for a while but it's bearable. Keep in mind this at a time when I had forgotten even how to add fractions :p so it's possible without a background in phys & math. Btw, get a BriefER History of Time. It's just an updated version. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME, question  General Physics  3  
Difference between the brief and the briefer history in time  Science & Math Textbook Listings  2  
Brief History of Time  Academic Guidance  12  
A Brief History of Time question...  General Discussion  1 