Labeling n-Cubes: 2ⁿ - 1 Ways to Arrange Vertices

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of labeling the vertices of an n-cube with the labels 0 to 2ⁿ - 1, ensuring that an edge exists between two vertices if their labels differ by exactly one bit. Participants explore different approaches to calculating the number of valid labelings while maintaining the properties of the n-cube.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the number of different labelings of the vertices in an n-cube, while keeping one vertex's label fixed, can be calculated as (2ⁿ - 1)(n(n - 1)/2), based on the number of ways to swap adjacent vertices.
  • Another participant questions the validity of the initial formula and suggests that the number of possible labels for a vertex should be 2ⁿ, indicating a potential error in the reasoning.
  • A later reply suggests that the number of ways to rearrange the labels of adjacent vertices is n!, leading to a new formula of n!2ⁿ for the total number of labelings, while also referencing a sequence related to this calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the correctness of the initial formulas and calculations. There is no consensus on the final number of valid labelings, as different approaches yield different results.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of vertex labeling and the properties of the n-cube may be implicit in the discussion. The validity of the proposed formulas remains unresolved, and participants have not fully reconciled their differing approaches.

e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
I need some closure on this one:

In how many ways can the vertices of an n-cube be labeled 0, … ,2ⁿ - 1 so that there is an edge between two vertices if and only if the binary representation of their labels differs in exactly one bit?

Let G be an appropriately labeled n-cube. Pick an arbitrary vertex v in G. How many ways can one change labels of the vertices appart from v in G and still mantain the properties of the n-cube? Because of the nature of G, there are n incident edges on v with n adjacent vertices. The labels of these vertices differ from the label of v by one bit. If one swaps the labels of two of these vertices and makes the appropriate swaps elsewhere so as to maintain the n-cube (which can be done due to the symmetry of G), one obtains a new labeling. The number of combination of adjacent vertices that can be swapped is n(n - 1)/2, so the number of different labelings of the vertices in G without changing the label of v is n(n - 1)/2.

The label of vertex v is arbitrary. Therefore, for every possible label of v there are n(n - 1)/2 labelings of the vertices in G. Because there are 2ⁿ - 1 possible labels for v, the number of possible labelings for the vertices in G is (2ⁿ - 1)(n - 1)n/2.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Interesting link. I just realized the formula I gave is pure BS (for one thing, the possible labels for a vertex v in G is 2ⁿ and even with this mod. the formula doesn't work). I'll have to look at this again...
 
Last edited:
OK. I think I have it know. Suppose G is an n-cube, appropriately labeled. Let v be a vertex in G. In how many ways can I change the labels of the vertices in G without changing the label of v? There are n adjecent vertices to v. I can move the labels of these vertices around (making the appropriate changes to rest of G) and obtain a new labeling of the vertices in G in n! ways. Since the label of v can be one of 2ⁿ possibilities, the number of different vertex-labelings in G is n!2ⁿ.

The sequence generated seems to be the same as that in:
http://www.research.att.com/cgi-bin/access.cgi/as/njas/sequences/eismum.cgi
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 178 ·
6
Replies
178
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K