| Thread Closed |
Oversensitivity |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Aug14-04, 03:17 AM | #1 |
|
|
Oversensitivity
I was on snopes and came across this article:
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/cool.htm |
| Aug14-04, 03:24 AM | #2 |
|
|
I think that any representation that includes two long rectangles standing vertically, in close proximity to a suspended, long cylinder with a flat cross member, should be banned forever!!!
![]() Edit: Of course, if the imagery provokes thoughts of 911 then it probably wouldn't create a positive feeling about the advertised product. In that light I can see why they pulled the ad. |
| Aug14-04, 05:11 AM | #3 |
|
|
I should have thought the symbolism was obvious, if not outrageous. But its use does call into question the notion of advertisers using subtle (or subliminal) symbolism to promote products, as the symbolism here would certainly backfire, unless the posters were intended to promote sales in the Afghan mountains.
|
| Aug14-04, 01:32 PM | #4 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 4
|
Oversensitivity |
| Aug14-04, 01:40 PM | #5 |
|
|
Thank you Evo. I'm glad at least some people can be sensible about this sort of thing. You can assign a meaning to anything (cfr. the succes of psychoanalysis). This doesn't mean you should.
|
| Aug16-04, 09:03 AM | #6 |
|
|
|
| Aug16-04, 11:25 AM | #7 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 4
|
It doesn't even make any sense. Why would a coffee shop think that making fun of the World Trade Towers event make people want to drink one of their new fruit drinks? The answer is, this had nothing to do with that event. So, a poster of two children standing together mocks 9/11? A picture of two trees side by side? Two cups of fruit drinks? Honestly, if you had seen that poster without knowing what some people thought they were seeing, would you have made any connection? |
| Aug16-04, 03:18 PM | #8 |
|
|
I agree that any reference to the 9/11 tragedy must have been unintentional on the basis that Starbucks is a US business. Perhaps the ad was okayed before 9/11? Otherwise I am amazed that the advertising bods didn't see this complaint coming. After all, I have been led to believe that they use subtle symbolism in advertising as a matter of routine, something like an inkblot where most people will see pretty much the same thing there e.g a butterfly, although we all know its just an inkblot. The only reason that I can see that people wouldn't read more into the Starbucks poster is that its just too painful to acknowledge. In fact I feel like apologising for talking about it in what seems like a trivialising context. In fact I'd rather not discuss it further myself, out of respect. |
| Aug16-04, 04:06 PM | #9 |
|
|
|
| Aug16-04, 04:44 PM | #10 |
|
|
Notice that at the top of the poster it says "Collapse Into Cool." That kind of struck me as odd. But still its rediculous someone would complain about something so stupid.
|
| Aug16-04, 05:11 PM | #11 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 4
|
Or they could have said "Attack your thirst" it's just using marketing buzz words. I guess if they had one more flavor to advertise it wouldn't have been an issue?
I just think there are too many people with too much time on their hands looking for problems where there aren't any. |
| Aug16-04, 05:21 PM | #12 |
|
|
Uh oh. I just noticed I have a tall plastic cup and a tall container of powdered coffee creamer sitting near each other on my side table here. What should I do?
|
| Aug16-04, 06:22 PM | #13 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 4
|
This has really gotten me to thinking. How many restaurants have you been to that had salt & pepper shakers standing next to each other on a table? How dare they? Don't they know what that means?? |
| Aug18-04, 05:20 PM | #14 |
|
|
Anyone sure this is actually a real Ad?
|
| Aug23-04, 04:03 AM | #16 |
|
|
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |